My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
26_0127_PWETC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2026
>
26_0127_PWETC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2026 8:53:57 AM
Creation date
1/29/2026 8:52:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/27/2026
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
those trying to make right turns because those vehicles now block the traffic lanes instead of <br />having an extended turn lane (especially at Commerce Street, the entrance ramp to 36 West and <br />County Road B-2). <br />29. "Temporary Sidewalk" on Pascal near Brooks: The poles marking this area jut into the traffic lane <br />and force vehicles traveling north into the opposing traffic lane. Anyone making right turn onto <br />Brooks from Pascal is forced to make a wide turn there —also forcing them into the lane for <br />oncoming traffic. I have lived at the corner of Hamline and Brooks for over 45years and have never <br />heard of a pedestrian/vehicle accident at that intersection. In my opinion, these poles will cause <br />more vehicle accidents because traffic is forced into the oncoming traffic lane to avoid the poles. <br />There is a fair amount of traffic on these streets, since the onlyway in or out of this neighborhood <br />is on Pascal (to County Road B-2) or Brooks (to Hamline). There is not enough foot traffic across <br />this intersection to warrant this demarcation. <br />30. Questions/Comments Relative to Both Areas: What is the plan for these area for the winter? If the <br />poles are left in place, how will snow plows operate and where will the snow be stacked? On the <br />bridge over Highway 36 there is no snow storage. What did it cost to install these poles and how <br />many have been damaged? Will those be replaced? If they are to be removed for the winter, will <br />they be replaced in the spring? At what cost? Did the high school administration request this on <br />Hamline and feel it was a safety issue for bike riding students? Did residents in the neighborhood <br />of Pascal and Brooks request the "temporary sidewalk"? Do you keep any statistics on who uses <br />the respective marked lanes? I welcome your answers to my questions and any feedback you <br />have. If you have any questions or want further information from me, please feel free to contact <br />me by email or phone. <br />31. Voicemail: He is very thankful for the City doing the pilot project. He has been very concerned for <br />pedestrian safety for a longtime and supports this project. <br />OPEN HOUSE COMMENTS <br />1. Concerned that the bump out on the SEC will push pedestrians walking north into the road where <br />it is narrowed <br />2. Vehicles turning north off Brooks Ave will go into southbound lane, especially buses <br />3. Absolutely worst idea to narrow road, install sidewalk behind existing curb <br />4. Move sidewalk from back of curb where narrowing and create a landscape boulevard instead <br />separating sidewalk further from road <br />5. Why not extend the sidewalk to the existing curb ramp? <br />6. Concerns with no parking past the existing curb ramp since no parking is proposed on the entire <br />west side of road from Brooks Ave to Rose Place, where will people park for events at the park? <br />7. Looks good to me. I still would like a stop sign on the County B2 side of Pascal -right below the <br />hill. Most sppeders are from the apartment. <br />8. 1 don't believe the proposed changes are needed. Thank you for the opportunity to provide <br />feedback. <br />9. 1 don't think its needed. <br />M <br />Page 29 of 84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.