CCP 02092026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: 2/9/2026 Item No.: 7.b. Department ApprovalCity Manager Approval Item Description:Consider a request to perform an abatement for unresolved violations of City Code at 1585 County Road C. 1 2 Background 3 The subject property is a commercial business (known as Jiffy Lube), located at the northeastern corner 4 of County Road C and Lincoln Ave. The current violations on this property are for the outside storage of 5 used tires and other containers of used automotive parts in public view (Attachment 1). These are 6 violations of Roseville City Code 405.02.(8) and 405.03.(9) (Attachment 3). 7 8 City staff received a complaint from the public regarding the storage of used tires at this property on 9 January 6, 2026. Staff verified the violation and provided a written notice to the property owner and 10 tenant (Attachment 4). Staff requested corrections to the observed violations within 10 days of the 11 written notice. Staff conducted a re-inspection on January 21, 2026 and found no progress toward 12 compliance with City Code. Staff sent a second violation letter with a compliance date of January 30, 13 2026. On January 30, staff observed some progress toward compliance, yet violations remained. Staff 14 discussed the concerns with the manager of the business and communicated the matter would be 15 discussed at a public meeting before City Council on February 9, 2026. The manager stated that the 16 business owner had proposed to construct an accessory structure to house the outside storage items, 17 but chose not to move forward with the construction. Staff confirmed that a building permit had been 18 applied for on October 8, 2025 for such an accessory enclosure, but the contractor failed to provide any 19 follow-up communication or building plans related to the enclosure and the permit remained unissued. 20 Of further concern, the City Planner was not able to approve the location or exterior materials proposed 21 for the enclosure without the requested information. The Building Department has made four requests to 22 the applicant for more information, with no response to-date. As of the writing of this RCA, no 23 communication has been received from the property owner, manager or applicant/contractor. A timeline 24 of staff actions is included in Attachment 2. 25 26 Policy Objectives 27 Property abatements, although considered a last resort, support the City's responsive services and 28 safety strategic priority. These actions advance the City's desired impact that community members feel 29 confident city services are responsive to ongoing needs and positively impact their quality of 30 life. Abatement of public nuisances supports the goal of taking proactive steps to create a safer 31 community through prevention, planning and early intervention. 32 33 Equity Impact Summary 34 Equity impacts have not been evaluated. 35 36 Budget Implications City Abatement The estimated costs of the proposed abatement include the following: Page 1 of 2 Qbhf!29!pg!271