My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02092026
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2026
>
CCP 02092026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2026 10:41:47 AM
Creation date
2/25/2026 10:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/9/2026
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
170 Nays: 0 <br />171 Motion carried. <br />172 <br />173 Ms. Baker urged the commission to consider a simple, practical solutionand <br />174 strongly advocatedfor a four-way stop at the intersection. She expressed <br />175 frustration with more complex design alternatives, stating that a four-way stop <br />176 would be clearer, faster, and more effective at slowing traffic than roadway <br />177 narrowing or other engineering treatments. <br />178 <br />179 Ms. Baker emphasized that drivers respond best to straightforward, visible <br />180 controls and questioned the effectiveness of signage or more subtle measures. <br />181 She concluded by encouraging decision-makers to prioritize common-sense <br />182 solutions that are easy for all drivers to understand. <br />183 <br />184 Mr. Rodenfelt reiterated his support for a simple, practical solution, specifically <br />185 advocating for a four-way stop at the intersection. He expressed frustration with <br />186 more complex design or engineering approaches, stating that a four-way stop <br />187 would be clearer and more effective at slowing traffic than psychological or <br />188 visual traffic-calming measures. He emphasized that straightforward controls <br />189 are easier for drivers to understand and comply with, and urged decision-makers <br />190 to implement a solution that prioritizes simplicity and effectiveness. <br />191 <br />192 Mr. Holland strongly supported a straightforward solution to the traffic <br />193 concerns, advocating for the installation of stop signs rather than costly <br />194 roadway or sidewalk modifications. He argued that stop signs are clear, well <br />195 understood by drivers, and effective at slowing traffic, especially if paired with <br />196 a lighted or highly visible “stop ahead” warning. <br />197 <br />198 Mr. Holland questioned the logic of allocating significant funds to sidewalk <br />199 construction or roadway narrowing. He suggestedinstalling a stop sign as a <br />200 trial, with the option to pursue more costly measures only if it proves <br />201 ineffective. He also supported redirecting traffic from the apartment area, but <br />202 acknowledged that such changes would require additionallong-term effort. <br />203 Overall, he urged the commission to apply common-sense, low-cost measures <br />204 first before committing to major infrastructure changes. <br />205 <br />206 Member Mueller discussed the four-way stop and the process of presenting it <br />207 to the council. <br />208 <br />209 Mr. Freihammer confirmed that Parks will weigh in on all options and present <br />210 them to the council. <br />211 <br />212 Acting Chair Hodder and Member Luongo inquired about the next steps and <br />213 the timeline for presenting recommendations to the council. <br />214 <br />Page 5of 6 <br />Qbhf!73!pg!271 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.