My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
26_0224_PWETC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2026
>
26_0224_PWETC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2026 10:04:05 AM
Creation date
2/27/2026 9:59:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/24/2026
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
217 <br />connection could reduce cut -through traffic. She concluded that adding a <br />218 <br />sidewalk or narrowing the roadway would not meaningfully slow traffic or <br />219 <br />improve safety. <br />220 <br />221 <br />Acting Chair Hodder thanked the residents for their comments. <br />222 <br />223 <br />Member Fergus questioned whether narrowing the street would slow traffic and <br />224 <br />suggested focusing on stop signs. <br />225 <br />226 <br />Member Mueller supported exploring stop signs and speed bumps as potential <br />227 <br />solutions. <br />228 <br />229 <br />Acting Chair Hodder and Member Fergus discussed the feasibility of option <br />230 <br />three, which involved adding a sidewalk without narrowing the road. <br />231 <br />232 <br />The Commissioners agreed to recommend option three and to consider adding <br />233 <br />stop signs as a separate motion. <br />234 <br />235 <br />Motion <br />236 <br />Member Mueller moved, Member Hodder seconded, recommending a <br />237 <br />four-way stop at the intersection. <br />238 <br />239 <br />Ayes:8 <br />240 <br />Nays:0 <br />241 <br />Motion carried. <br />242 <br />243 <br />Ms. Baker urged the commission to consider a simple, practical solution and <br />244 <br />strongly advocated for a four-way stop at the intersection. She expressed <br />245 <br />frustration with more complex design alternatives, stating that a four-way stop <br />246 <br />would be clearer, faster, and more effective at slowing traffic than roadway <br />247 <br />narrowing or other engineering treatments. <br />248 <br />249 <br />Ms. Baker emphasized that drivers respond best to straightforward, visible <br />250 <br />controls and questioned the effectiveness of signage or more subtle measures. <br />251 <br />She concluded by encouraging decision -makers to prioritize common-sense <br />252 <br />solutions that are easy for all drivers to understand. <br />253 <br />254 <br />Mr. Rodenfelt reiterated his supportfor a simple, practical solution, specifically <br />255 <br />advocating for afour-way stop at the intersection. He expressed frustration with <br />256 <br />more complex design or engineering approaches, stating that a four-way stop <br />257 <br />would be clearer and more effective at slowing traffic than psychological or <br />258 <br />visual traffic -calming measures. He emphasized that straightforward controls <br />259 <br />are easier for drivers to understand and comply with, and urged decision -makers <br />260 <br />to implement a solution that prioritizes simplicity and effectiveness. <br />261 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />Page 101 of 105 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.