My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-0224 PWETC Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2026
>
2026-0224 PWETC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2026 8:56:47 AM
Creation date
3/25/2026 8:56:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/24/2026
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
are welcome to ask questions throughout rather than waiting <br />until the end <br />Member Fergus asked for clarification about the food paper wrappers and <br />liners that are exempt under the Green To Go ordinance, specifically <br />wondering whether those materials are typically coated with wax or plastic. <br />Ms. Bakken indicated she would just put those materials in the trash. <br />Member Fergus said he was thinking of materials like parchment paper and <br />questioned whether it would be overly burdensome for businesses to switch to <br />compostable options for food paper wrappers and liners. <br />Ms. Bakken explained that one challenge with food paper wrappers and liners <br />is that it can be difficult to determine what type of coating they contain, such <br />as wax or plastic, and whether they are truly compostable. She noted that she <br />has not yet identified parchment -style products that are clearly compostable, <br />though she acknowledged she could look into it further. She added that <br />products certified as compostable, such as those labeled BPI, would qualify. <br />Ms. Bakken also shared an update that the City's recycling hauler, Waste <br />Management, is now accepting plastic -lined paper cups in its recycling <br />stream, which changes previous guidance. Throughout 2025, compostable <br />cups were essentially the only compliant option. However, Waste <br />Management is currently the only material recovery facility in the Twin Cities <br />accepting those cups, and acceptance does not yet extend to similar items, <br />such as bowls. She cautioned that if contamination issues arise or other <br />haulers report problems, the City may revisit whether those cups remain <br />eligible for use. Under the ordinance, materials accepted by the City's <br />residential recycling hauler qualify as compliant. <br />Member Cicha asked how many restaurants are currently listed as compliant <br />under the Green To Go program and how many remain noncompliant. <br />Ms. Bakken estimated that Green To Go compliance is currently likely in the <br />low 20% range. Midway through last year, it was around 19%, and she <br />believes it has increased slightly since then. She said she will confirm the <br />exact number from her spreadsheet and share updated figures with the <br />Commission. <br />Ms. Bakken highlighted the City's first clothing swap event, led by the 2025 <br />sustainability intern, which she described as a major success. The event <br />collected more than 2,100 pounds of clothing and drew 116 participants in a <br />single afternoon. Donations were gathered from community members and <br />local churches. At least half, and possibly up to two-thirds, of the clothing was <br />redistributed directly to residents, with the remaining items donated to <br />nonprofit organizations. She noted lessons learned, including the need for <br />additional sorting time and the potential to expand the event to multiple days <br />Page 10 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.