2026-0324 PWETC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. Freihammer indicated that when filling gaps in existing infrastructure, staff would typically match what is already in place, such as continuing a sidewalk or trail on the same side of the street. He added that in some cases the plan may specify aparticular side, such as north or south, when there is an existing facility on one side and a need to extend it. Mr. Freihammer noted that, for the proposed segments under consideration, the focus at this stage is on whether the connection should be included at all, rather than on determining the exact placement or facility type. Member Fergus asked what the difference was between a trail and a sidewalk. Mr. Freihammer explained that all connections are considered pathways within the pathway master plan, with distinctions between trails and sidewalks based on design and use. He noted that trails are typically eight to ten feet wide, constructed of bituminous material, and designed to accommodate biking and walking with additional clear space. Mr. Freihammer indicated that sidewalks are generally six feet wide, constructed of concrete, and primarily intended for pedestrian use, although biking is permitted. He added that trails are better suited to multi -use activities, including both biking and walking. Mr. Freihammer explained that sidewalks are generally intended for walking, although children may also use them for biking. He noted that the standard sidewalk width is typically six feet to allow two people to walk side by side comfortably, although widths may vary in some cases. Mr. Freihammer then transitioned to the pathway segment review, noting that the Commission would continue working through the listed segments in order. He explained that the meeting materials included the original pathway master plan, a map with labeled segments for proposed additions, and a spreadsheet with descriptions of existing segments for reference and potential modification. Mr. Freihammer reported that the Commission had previously reviewed segments 9 and 16 and would begin with segment 12C. He described the segment as Lexington Avenue, currently identified as completing an off -road pathway on the east side from County Road C to County Road D. He noted that a pathway already exists from County Road C to County Road C2 and suggested that the description could be modified to reflect a connection from County Road C2 to County Road D. Mr. Freihammer explained that the segment would pass through an area that includes open space, nearby apartments, and commercial uses. He indicated that staff would recommend a trail for this segment, consistent with existing conditions along much of the corridor. He noted that the Commission could Page 7 of 28