CC_Minutes_1965_0405 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

VILLAGE OF ROSEVILLE Regular Meeting of the Village Council - April 5, 1965. The Village Council met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor Curley, Trustees Goodrich, Grauel and Shields. Absent: Mayor Cedarholm. Goodrich MovedD Grauel Seconded. that the minutes of the regular meeting of March 15, 1965, be approved. Roll Call, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Grauel Movedo Goodrich Seconded, that the minutes of the special meeting of March 22. 1965, be approved. Roll Call, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Acting Mayor Curley opened the public hearing for proposed Street Improvement 65=25 and 65-26. He requested that the Clerk present the affidavits of publication and certificates of mailing on these proposed improvements. The Village Clerk presented an affidavit showing publication of notice of hearing on proposed Improvement 65-25 (Commerce Street, Pascal Avenue to Albert Street) and notice of hearing on proposed Improvement 65-26 (Albert Street from County Road B to Commerce Street) in accordance with resolution adopted March 8, 1965, which affidavits were examined and found to be satisfactory and were directed to be filed by the Clerk. The Village Clerk also exhibited a certificate of mailing of notice of hearing for both proposed improvements to all affected property owners which certificates were examined and found to be satisfactory and were directed to be filed by the Clerk. The Mayor then directed the Clerk to read the description of the general nature and estimated cost of the proposed improvements and the area proposed to be assessed therefor as stated in the published notices of hearing. After reading of the notices, all persons present were afforded an opportunity to be heard. No one appeared in connection with proposed Improvement 65-25 (Commerce Street - Pascal Avenue to Albert Street). The following persons appeared and were heard by the counci 1 in regard to proposed Improvement 65-26 (Albert Street from County Road B to Commerce Street) and the substance of the views presented by them were as follows: Mrs. Donald Homo 1397 West County Road B: Questioned how the improvement would affect their taxes. Since the Council felt there was no benefit, this .property was not to be assessed. Mr. Philip Newberg. representing Golden Age Nursing Home, 1415 West County Road B: Felt he was having a double assessment. Mr. and Mrs. J. M. Wallgren, 2231 Hamline: Wanted to know what the elevation of Albert Street would be and how it would affect their property. Further said that he understood there was an ordinance 7:30 P.M. MINUTES PUBLIC HEARING STREET IMPROVE= MENT 65=25 AND 65-26