CC_Minutes_1966_0224 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Council, and the substance of the views presented by them, were as follows: D~. EMMET WILLIAMS, Superintendent of Independent School District No. 623 (Roseville): In favor of the improvement. HARRY OPEL, 910 W. County Road B: Concerned about the foot traffic on County Road B. MRS. MAX DE FLORIN, 1027 H. County Road B: Wanted to know why Highway 36 couldn't be used for the heavy traffic, particular- ly busses. MR. MILTON FLEU, 1186 ~.Jest County Road B: Inquired as to whether the new roadway between L~xington and Ham1ine would be bituminous blacktopping or concrete. If not concrete, why would it be necessary to have a curb and gutter. MR. VICTOR J. DEC, 1060 t~est County Road B: Explained that ingress and egress is difficult now with a 35 mile an hour speed limit. He felt this situation would be made worse if the street was widened and the speed limit would be increased. MRS. C. A. THORPE, 915 W. County Road B: Asked if the speed limit would be raised if the tmprovement is ordered. Also wanted to know if the installation of sidewalks had been con- sidered. MR. DAVID MOOlU:, 1130 County Road B: \'uanted to know the overall width from curb to curb between Lexington and Hamline, whether or not the elevation of the road would be changed, who would pay for it if it was changed, and if there was enough right of way for sidewalks. J. D. SMITH, 1244 West County Road B: wanted to knew why the side streets would not be assessed. MR. DONALD MADISON, 817 t'ifest County .i.~ad B: Also inquired as to whether the street and curb and 3utter were bituminous or concrete. MR. EDWARD SCHMITZ, 1275 County .Road B: Wanted to know if the widening of County aoad B would increase the truck traffic. ~. PHILBROOK BURNHAM, 1266 West County Road B: Wanted to know what protection would be aftorded the children who walk on County Road B and whether or not they could walk on the property inside the curb.