My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1966_0224
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1966
>
CC_Minutes_1966_0224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:51:05 AM
Creation date
2/1/2005 10:58:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/24/1966
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. HAROLD SUONEK, 1065 Burke: Asked if the street would be <br />brought up to grade and surfaced after the stor~ sewer is com- <br />pleted. <br /> <br />NR. HERMAN HEINRICHS, 696 Shryer: Felt that people on the <br />Dale street hill would not benefit fro~ the storm sewer in any <br />way. <br /> <br />MR. DONALD NADISON, 817 West County Road B: Has filed a <br />petition with the Council in opposition to the imp~ovement. <br /> <br />MR. GENE OWENS, lC26 liJ. County HOnd B: In favor of the <br />improvement. <br /> <br />MR. JAMES KROLL. ~~2~'~ ;';'):rt:- ':'~'I"::'l,U~ Has no direct benefit <br />from the improvement "nr1 dC-2S r~o'1: ":3:1t to iJe included. <br /> <br />MR. RICHARD N!CH~)LSO!'!~ I.,)~.~ :'f<;ft County Road B: In favor <br />of the improvement. <br /> <br />rv\R. FOREST lI,'OI,l-:[, 94C ~h<:':-.=;I: In favor of the improvement, <br />but also believes stn".:'I1" 52., p',:J 3Lollld be constructed over the <br />entire village with t~e co-:;-.; ~;I; ;~2 paid by general taxes rather <br />than assessments. <br /> <br />MR. WAX DE FLORIN, lJ....L..,.p".-:: County Road B: Has already <br />been assessed for storm sew(.l' :;r;0 'anted to know if he would <br />be assessed again. <br /> <br />MP.. GERALD CHRISTENSEN, 669 "rest Shryer: Opposed to the <br />improvement. <br /> <br />NE. EARL EBERHARDT, 662 Shryer: Will receive no direct <br />benefit from the improvement and thinks the entire village should <br />pay the cost. <br /> <br />lVRS. MAX DE FLORIN, lC27 West County Road B: Wanted to know <br />if the storm sewer would help the water situation on Mr. Owens' <br />lot. . <br /> <br />MR. THO~~S HENDERSON, 1027 Burke: Asked what determined <br />whether or not the improvement was approved. Further said that <br />he could take care of his own problems. <br /> <br />MR. LOREN PETERSON, 085 Sherren: Wanted to know if this <br />improvement vvould be dra ining into Lake McCarrons. <br /> <br />NR. KERMIT tv'C RAE, 758 Sherren: Wanted to know if the <br />county would continue with the street improvement if the storm <br />sewer improvement was not approved by the village. <br /> <br />NR. HARRY OPEL, QIC W. County Road B: Concerned about the <br />contamination of Lake McCarrons with the storm sewer draining <br />into it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.