Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City <br />Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, was held in the city Hall <br />in said city on Monday, December 10, 1990, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Thomas, Johnson, Maschka, Cushman, <br />and Rog <br /> <br />and the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />Councilmember Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved <br />its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 8631 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENT NO. ST-P-SW-89-17 <br />AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR UNDER <br />AND PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 429 <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, that <br />in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, as <br />amended, the Council held a public hearing on the proposed construction <br />of Improvement No. ST-P-SW-89-17 consisting of the installation of storm <br />sewer, bituminous paving, curb and gutter, non-motorized pathway, and <br />necessary appurtenances on all that property abutting County Road B from <br />Dale Street to a point approximately 1,200 feet east of Rice Street. as <br />described in the Notice of Hearing at a cost presently estimated at <br />$2,421,327.87, and substantially in accordance with the preliminary <br />report as to the feasibility thereof which is now on file in the office <br />of the City Manager; and having considered the views of all interested <br />persons and being fully advised in the premises, the Council does hereby <br />determine and order that said improvement shall be constructed and <br />financed. The Ramsey County Public Works Director shall prepare and <br />submit to the Council the final plans and specifications. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly <br />seconded by Councilmember Thomas and upon roll call vote being taken <br />thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Thomas, Johnson, <br />Maschka, Cushman, and Rog <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />