CC_Minutes_1971_0908 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MR. FREDE T. SALOMONSEN, 195 Woodlynn Avenue: Every time it rains he has a lake on his lower lot. Asked that some adjustment be made. MR. ALVIN FEDKENHEUER, 1992 N. Cleveland: Doesn't believe he should be included in the assessment since his storm water doesn't run in the direction as described in the report. MRS. PEARL CANNON, 2120 N. Cleveland: Has been assessed on an acreage basis for one and a half acres, but feels that she should only be assessed for two lots because of the location of the house. MR. RICHARD SONTERRE, 2924 Galtier St.: Doesn't understand where the "improvement" is because the water is still going where it was before. MR. PAUL FRILSETH, 349 County Road C-2 West: Some of his neighbors had not received a notice of the hearing. It was pointed out that some of his neighbors are not included in the improvement and, therefore, are not being assessed. Half of his water will flow into the sewer and half into the swamp. For this reason, he questioned why he was getting a full assessment. MR HAROLD SCHMIDT, 2991 Woodbridge St.: Said he didn't object to the assessment, but did object to the feasibility of the improvement because it wasn't necessary. MR. QUINTON HECI<ERT, 3050 Woodbridge: The whole area is a natural drainage and the improvement wasn't necessary. Commented on the bad condition of the streets. MR. EDWIN KUHNE, 3047 Woodbridge: Thought there was a waste of money being experienced through a careless handling of the storm sewer pipes and people's lawns. MR. GEORGE RISTY, 2001 W. Eldridge: Lives on the corner of Wilder and Eldridge and on his side of Wilder there is absolutely no storm water problem. Also asked if the street would be repaired. FROM THE AUDIENCE: Questions about perJDanent streets and curbs and gutters. MR. RICHARD SONTERRE, 2924 Galtier (Spoke before): Questioned the location of the storm sewer mains in connection with the water mains. MR. DAVID DUNCAN, 2825 Marion: Asked for the rationale of the assessment formula. He thought it would have been more fair on a square foot basis. COUNCILMAN ANDERSON indicated that he had received a phone call from MRS. PETER SETTECASI, 165 S. OWasso Blvd. She was assessed on a commercial basis because she has a beauty shop in the house. She believes she should be assessed one half on the commer- cial basis and one half on the residential basis. MR. PETER SETTACASI, 165 S. <wasso Blvd.: Said the water isn't going to drain anyplace and his driveway is broken up. MR. EDWIN KUHNE, 3047 WOodbridge (Spoke before) : Questioned the safety factor of the ditch parallel to South OWasso Blvd.