Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of Meeting <br />of City Council <br />city of Roseville <br />Ramsey County, Minnesota <br />April 4, 1977 <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call ~nd notice thereof, a special meeting <br />of the City Council of the city of Hosevilleo Minnesota, was <br />held in the City Hall in said City on Monday, April 4, 1977 <br />at 7:30 o'clock p. m. <br /> <br />The following members were present~ Mayor Demos, and <br />Councilmen Hess, Anderson, Curley, and Graue17 and the following <br />were absent: None <br /> <br />Also present were Mr. James Andre, City Manager~ Robert Bell, <br />City Attorney~ Charles Honchell, City Public Horks Director: and <br />Peter S. Popovich, City Bond Consultant. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: At this time we will open the hearing on <br />Project SS-W-P-7.7-2. <br /> <br />I.J.lR. ~NDRE: This is the Chatsworth Street, south of rilillwood <br />improvement - sanitary sewer, watermain, and street. I have on <br />file the affidavit of publication of the Notice of the Hearing and <br />the Certificate of mailing and the hearing notices. <br /> <br />rffi. HONCHELL: This project also is a result of a petition. <br />This petition is from the people that mvn a rather large corner lot. <br />It's 330 feet in depth but only about 85 feet in width. The <br />(inaudible) fact is that Chatsworth has a temporary street, or at <br />least some paving, as does Millwood to the east. There is no <br />improvement to this leg of Millwood or the southerly leg of <br />Chatsworth and it's impossible to give a building permit to a <br />street that has no improved street in front. Ne, therefore 0 reviewed <br />some possible ways that this improvement could be provided. <br /> <br />One of the ways we looked at was to try and take a long range <br />view and see how that whole area potentially could be opened up. <br />There are very deep lots also coming from the south and a deep <br />lot coming on the other corner. Therefore, we reviewed the pos- <br />sibility of bringing this street back - and needed a cul-de-sac. <br />One reason we didn't take it all the way back (inaudible) in doing <br />that there's a steep grade coming down the hill and back up again, <br />but down the hill an~~ay that would require substantial fill to <br />keep the roadway grades at a 6% maximum (inaudible) to have the <br />property then be high enough to get into the existing sanitary <br />sewer which is in this location, because if you go down too <br />fast you will find that the ground is then lower than the sanitary <br />sewers and each of the homes would have had to put in their own <br />