My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1988_0314
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
198x
>
1988
>
CC_Minutes_1988_0314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:01:28 AM
Creation date
2/2/2005 7:06:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/14/1988
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville City Council Minutes <br />I/lal'ch 14, 1988 <br /> <br />1. That the development be developed in accordance <br />with the submitted plans dated February 22, 1988. <br /> <br />2. That the development be subject to final review <br />of landscaping, screening, and drainage by city <br />staff. <br /> <br />3. That additional screening and landscaping be <br />provided between the truck dock area and County <br />Road B as shown on plans dated March 8, 1988. <br /> <br />4. That the applicant will resurface the parking lot <br />to correct existing major standing water problems. <br /> <br />S. That an additional 9-1;'2 feet of right-of-way be <br />dedicated along County Road B. <br /> <br />6. That an 8 foot pathway be constructed adjacent to <br />County Road B at owner's expense. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Cushman, Johnson, Matson, Kehr, and <br />Rog. Nays: None. <br /> <br />...., ~ <br />1:..-,;':: <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Cushman seconded, that the detennina- <br />tion that the Rosepointe developers of the Forum <br />Apartments have met the condition of constructing a <br />brick wall be approved with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1 <br />" . <br /> <br />That the wall adjacent to the residence in ques- <br />tion be constructed according to the plans dated <br />March 14, 1988. <br /> <br />') <br />t_ . <br /> <br />That a landscape plan be developed for the <br />interior court of the wall with an emphasis on <br />coniferous planting to be approved by city staff. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />That a hedge be placed on the west side of the <br />site between the greenhouse and the southwest <br />corner of the lot. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />That final plans for the comprehensive land- <br />scaping of the wall be approved by staff. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: <br />and Rog. Nays: <br /> <br />Cushman, Johnson, Matson, Kehr, <br />None. <br /> <br />E-3 <br /> <br />Matson moved, Kehr seconded, that the Economic Devel- <br />opment Policy Implementation Guidelines dated March <br />14, 1988, be adopted. Roll Call, Ayes: Cushman, <br />Johnson, Matson, Kehr, and Rog. Nays: None. <br /> <br />E--4 <br /> <br />Cushman moved, Kehr seconded, that Ordinance 1031, <br />amending Chapter 125 of the City Code of Roseville, <br />regulating lawful gambling within the city, be <br />adopted. Roll Call, Ayes: Cushman, Johnson, Matson, <br />Kehr, and Rag. Nays: None. <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />FORUIVJ <br />APARTMENTS <br />(ROSEPOINTE <br />BRICK WALL) <br /> <br />ECONOMIC <br />DEVELOPMENT <br />POLICY <br />GUIDELINES <br /> <br /><JR.DIN.'\NCE <br />1031 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.