CC_Minutes_1993_0524 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville city council Minutes May 24, 1993 Compliance with these issues shall be determined by the city Development Review Committee. If the Development Review Committee believes that the design does not fit within these guidelines, this portion of the project will be referred to the Planning commission and City Council for an amendment to the PUD. 12. That ownership of the Simpson parcel be finalized before any final approvals are given for the PUD that might affect that property. A plan for interim use of the parcel should be developed and reviewed by staff. 13. That as much vegetation as possible along the creek be left intact. 14. That the possibility of installing stop signs on Lincoln Drive at the entrance to the independent living facility be studied. 15. That staff review traffic count methodology. 16. That the ponds be maintained by applicant and designed to meet Metropolitan Council recommended standards. Staff should review and recommend a maintenance schedule if appropriate. 17. That the applicant be encouraged to increase evergreen materials. 18. That there be strong architectural continuity for the entire project. Staff should review all future development to ensure that continuity is maintained. 19. That the final exterior materials and colors be submitted for Council consideration as part of the final development plan. 20. That progress be demonstrated on correction to the soil erosion problems adjacent to the main campus as part of the final PUD plan approval. 21. That the approvals are contingent upon submittal of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council. 22. That the final development plan be consistent with the plans submitted to the City Council, which includes the revised independent living building with a total height of 69 feet and 132 dwelling units. Roll Call, Ayes: P. Johnson, Maschka, Cushman, Goedeke, and V. Johnson. Nays: None. Page 6