Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o2-~. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the County Auditor of Ramsey County requires that apportionment o~' <br /> <br />the original assessment againJt each origL\al 'Ci'8.:t ".Ihcr ,; it "\3 L~ter b',,:ni v::,:.Cl:, <br /> <br />sold or conveyed, be luade by the Village Council of the Village of Roseville in order <br /> <br />that the ~roper assessment can be extended by the County Auditor against each parcel <br /> <br />of property thereafter, comoencing with an assessment to be collected in the year <br />1965 and thereafter, <br /> <br />NOW, THER8FOBE, the Village Council of the Village of Roseville doe~) hereby' <br /> <br />lllw:e the following apportionment of original assessments as contained in said <br /> <br />assessment roll of Oct. 14, 1963 against th2 followinG described properties: <br /> <br />ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT <br />---"(see page 53) <br />(A) <br />Ex S 100 ft of N 403.5 ft of W 405.42 ft <br />& ex S 118.l3Ift; the SW t of NW i (subj <br />to HWys, Ris & esmts) in <br />See 9, T 29, R 23 <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />(B) <br />Ex N 66 ft & ex E 410 ft of S 200 ft of <br />N 266 ft & ex E 410 ft of S 212 ft of N <br />508 ft; the SE ~ of NW t. Also NE ~ of <br />SW i ( subj to esmts, Hwy & rds) all in <br />Sec 9, T 29, R 23 <br /> <br />$24,788.00 <br /> <br />REAPFORTIONMENT <br />(1) Same as (A) <br />(2 ) ffi esmt over (A) <br />(3) Same as (B) <br />(4 ) Rd esmt over (B) <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />$23,769.00 <br />$ 1,019.00 <br />