My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_1062
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
01xxx
>
1000
>
res_1062
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:04:56 AM
Creation date
4/23/2005 4:08:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
1062
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The Mayor announced that the meeting was open for the <br /> <br />consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed asses~- <br />ment. All persons present were then given an opportunity to <br />present oral objections, and all written objections thereto- <br />fore filed with the Village Clerk were presented and considered, <br />and all such objections were tabulated as follows: <br /> <br />!i?!E~ <br /> <br />,Er02erty <br /> <br />!::!~tur~ of..Q.!2kf,1i2.n <br /> <br />MR. OLE RICE, 1975 M.lvern: Felt the amount of his assessment <br />was too high. <br /> <br />MR. CHARLES AREND, representing st. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co., <br />429 N. Prior: Referred to a tri.ngular piece of property bounded <br />by County Road B-2, Walnut and Minnesota Transfer. Purchased <br />part of their property from Minnesota Transfer and paid an extra <br />amount ~t the time of purchase for the construction of streets. <br />Therefore, they feel their assessment is too high. <br /> <br />MR. ROBERT CARR, 2390 Fulham: Thinks the assessment is too <br />high for residential property. <br /> <br />MR. FRANK GRAHAM of Briggs & Morgan, representing Ruan Transport <br />Company: referred to the property at the southeast corner of <br />County Road C just where Long Lake Road comes into County Road C. <br />They have been assessed for 306 feet on Long Lake Road. He said <br />they objected at the feasibility hearing on the grounds that this <br />road was not necessary and would not benefit their property. In <br />addition, this is an odd shaped piece of property - 306 feet at the <br />front and about 280 feet at the rear. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.