My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_115
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
00xxx
>
100
>
res_115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:05:05 AM
Creation date
4/23/2005 4:10:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
115
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />southerly 1,062 feet; thence westerly 175 feet; thence <br />southerly approximately 250 feet to center line of Roselawn <br />Avenue; thence easterly along center line of Roselawn <br />Avenue to the intersection of Hamline Avenue and hoselawn <br />Avenue; thence southerly along center line Hamline Avenue <br />to the intersection of Larpenteur Avenue and Hamline Avenue; <br />thence easterly along center line of Larpenteur Avenue to <br />the intersection of Rice Street and Larpenteur Avenue; <br />thence northerly along center line of Rice Street to the <br />point of beginning. <br /> <br />and to assess the benefited property for a portion of the cost <br />of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutest Sections <br />429.011 to 429.111 (Laws 1953, Ch. 398, as amended), <br /> <br />NOW, THEREOFRE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF <br />THE VILLAGE OF ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA: <br /> <br />That the proposed improvement be referred to Banister <br />Engineering Company for study and that they are instructed to <br />report to the Council with all convenient speed, advising the <br />Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improve- <br />ment is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as <br />proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the <br />estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution <br /> <br />was duly seconded by Member ~ ' and upon vote being <br /> <br />taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: <br />~~\Il1W' C"'t\,...~~- l(\T{~ -~IW\~{ij\- f'\~~ <br />and the following voted against the same: -tVc/vG <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.