My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_1178
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
01xxx
>
1100
>
res_1178
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:05:06 AM
Creation date
4/23/2005 4:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
1178
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 1178 <br /> <br />Extract of Minutes of Meeting <br />of Village Council <br />Village of Roseville <br />Ramsey County, Minnesota <br />April 5, 1965 <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting <br />of the Village Council of the Village of Roseville, Minnesota, <br /> <br />was held at the Council Chambers in the Village Hall in said <br />Village on Monday, April 5, 1965, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Acting Mayor Curley, Goodrich, <br />Grauel and Shields <br />and the following were absent: Mayor Ceaarholm <br />The Village Clerk presented an affidavit showing publication <br />of Notice of Hearing on proposed Improvement 65-26 (Albert Street <br />from County Road B to Commerce Street) in accordance with the <br />resolution adopted March 8, 1965, which affidavit was examined and <br />found to be satisfactory and was directed to be filed by the Clerk. <br />The Village Clerk also exhibited a Certificate of Mailing Notice of <br />Hearing to all affected property owners, which certificate was <br /> <br />examined and found to be satisfactory and was directed to be filed <br /> <br />by the Clerk. <br />The Mayor then directed the Clerk to read the description <br /> <br />of the general nature and estimated cost of the proposed improve- <br /> <br />ment and the area proposed to be assessed therefor, as stated in <br /> <br />the published notice of hearing. After reading of the notice, <br />all persons present were afforded opportunity to be heard, and <br /> <br />the names and addresses of the persons appearing and heard by <br /> <br />the Council, and the substance of the views presented by them <br /> <br />were as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.