Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rW3E'nr..rn P1lHUUJiG (}JI'" I ISS nm <br /> <br />SPF.CIAL HEETI'1 G <br />r/arch 15, 1960 <br /> <br />'n1e meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairman Membrez at 7: 30 P .r~ . <br />CoJlldanonera G1l1es, Grauel, Simerman present. Mr. Bell arrived at "(:50 P.M. <br />Planner Dahlgren and Engineer Sautter were also prp.sent. <br /> <br />3-15-60 A WOODJlUDOE PLAT DONALD ROBERTS (2-,-6OP) <br />Location Woodbridge at Larpenteur <br />The D180U8s1on of the prel1Jd.nary plat was tabled at the rtarch 2nd meeti~. The <br />matter vas taka1. from the table. <br />Mr. Robert Y.Leming, l7~ Oaltier, stated that he desired to withdraw his objections to <br />the plat because upon inves't1p,a'tion he bad learned that the construction costs of <br />gnd1ng t"~dg. Ave. on the module would be excessive. <br />Hr. W. H. D...n1elaon, 1la.6 Clarraar Lane, representing Ruby and Robert r.1cMmTsy, stated <br />that the t4ct1urray' s lot would be worthless if ~/oodbridge were to be graded on the <br />1IIDdu1e. lie indicated that bis clients would not grant an easement for the road nor <br />part1c1pate in the co'" of gradlng Woodbridge. <br />Mr. WDa. 1)187, 1716 Marion requested a recess to discuss the matter with his neighbors. <br />Recess ~. <br />~. a.ru, 1062 Orchard, indicated that the owners or the propertq 1II88t ot the plat <br />bad concluded that the locaUon or Woodbridge on the IIOdule appeare to be a "dead issueno <br /> <br />- <br />1'1'. DlD1e1aon stated the ~up' 8 op1n1on and indicated that the fn'Oup would not object <br />to the enot1-m ot ~ts on the proposed "loadbridge PJat provided that )0 foot <br />eetbaoke U"8 .unta1ned. <br /> <br />Tbere being no tartheI' atateraenta from the noar, 011188 moved, Oraue1 seoonded that <br />the J]INl1at.nary plat or the Woodbridge .Add! t.1on be recormnel'ded tor approval and that <br />a~t. be P8mi tted to be erected thereon. Motion carried unani1lCms]y. <br /> <br />M-6o 8 ID OOSSARD ADDITION PLAT W. ) <br />Location County Road "8- between Irene St. and Cabana.,- Blvd. <br />Mr.. Ed 801Al'd, 1040 ROlla, appeared 111 support of hia plat. <br />Hr.. Dahlgren co.ented that lots No.8 and lOot Block 2 were 8light1;r undersized but <br />this val pot 88I'1ous. In p,enenl the plan vao well d:'ne. ConC8I'D va. stated over two <br />b11ld1aca located on the eastern area ot the plat. Mr. Bossard assured the comn1ssion <br />that the_ bnUd1np weN to be tom down about June 1, 1960. <br /> <br />Mr. Soutte' stated that the rerised plat had t.be required center line gradients for <br />the atneta and that the drainage easements appeared to be acceptable. <br /> <br />81~ moved, Grauel 88COMed that the peel1m1na17 plat be recoJllTlended for approval" <br /> <br />./ <br /> <br />,/ <br /> <br />3-15-60 C At1I!DBNT TO THE ZORING ORDINA t<<::E toK)" 275 <br />Rlzot!I!IJ REQUEST MUST WAIT SIX MONTHS AP'TIiR BEING DIDtIED <br />b V1llage CouDcil reter1'Wd. aD ordinance amending the Zon1ng Ordinance to the Planning <br />eo.daa1on tor action. The Ordinance was read by' the secretar:r. <br />Sect.ton I <br />The toUow1Da eball be added to Sect.1.oD II, entitled "AmeDdmenta" ot ordinance 275: <br />IIlfo tJef'SOD, t1I'II or oorpcratton 8hall be ent1 tlecI to Jreaent any' pet1 tion tor the <br />resaa1nc ot land within ax (6) 1IOntb. t.roa the ncctpt ot a petition eee1dJJg <br />nb8~ the sall8 reson1n<< where each mpnal petition haa been euacted upon <br />aDd delde4. 'lb1. prorlll1on ebaU not attec't 81V" r1pt to p1'8l!18nt a pet1tA1.on where <br />a tar..- 1)8\1t1on has been w1thdran." . <br />