Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IJ' <br /> <br />if. <br />, <br />~ <br />" I <' I. "". <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. .:{"" <br /> <br />I:,' " " <br /> <br />) (,,', . .J.... ., <br /> <br />-J I' 'I', <br /> <br />Dahlgren suggested that a public hearing beheld" Inasmuch as the Village Council suggested <br />the street name study. he thought the Commission should seek the Council8s advicep as to the <br />legal asp8ct of carrying out the plan. <br /> <br />S1merman mo~d, 501,ke seconded~ that the Secretar.T write a letter to the Council tor legal <br />advice" on how t'o ~,tte~ the street name plano ~t1on carried. ' <br /> <br />'..... <br /> <br />WESTERN SLOPES ,PLAT' <br /> <br />Western at Ju~th <br /> <br />No one appeared in support ot the Plat.. <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />Soika moved. Swanson. aeconded, that. the Plat be tabled, until tne next regular meeting of <br />the Comm1as1oD:.on Febru817 1, '1961. Motion carriede <br /> <br />KROISS HOMESITES PLAT <br /> <br />Near Grotto' <br /> <br />10 one appeared in support of the Plato <br /> <br />Soike moved, SimerDl8ll seconded, that t he Plat be tabled, until the next regular meeting of <br />the Comm1asiOD, on February 1, 19610 Motion carriedo <br /> <br />VALOIS PLAT <br /> <br />Cleveland at Skillman <br /> <br />Robert D. Valois appeared in support ot the Plat. He owns the property fronting on Skillman <br />Avenue. He reported that the negotiations with the adjourning property owners to develope <br />tbe adjoining property to the South had failedo <br /> <br />Swanson moved, Soike seconded, that the V 81018 Plat should be denied, for t he following <br />reasons I (1) A stub road shou1d be provided in the Easterly portion of the Plat to <br />provide tor access to the property to the South. when it is developedo (2) It was further <br />recommended that the interested parties get together and attempt to vork out a satisfactory <br />solution. Hotton carr1edD <br /> <br />GLADISH ADDITION PLAT <br /> <br />305 No. Fa1~ <br /> <br />Robert Gladish, l661 Stanbridge, appeared in support of the Plat III' Mr. Gladish has an .option <br />to buY' the propert.:r, it the. lot can be subdividedo <br /> <br />Dahlgren adv1aed tha't the lot aize meets the requirements of the Village ~ce. However, <br />he SIlggssted that Gladish negotiate with1he owner of the property for an additional 10 .feet.!jl <br />to 1noreue the depth or the lot !rom 130 to 140 teet, to confora with the back lot lines ot <br />the adjoining lots. <br /> <br />Soia moved, SilDarman seconded. that the Gladish Addition Plat be continued until the next <br />regular meeting of the Comm1ssion on Fab1"ll&1'Y 1, 1961. Motion carriedo <br /> <br />PORTE PARK PLAT #2 <br /> <br />Fernwood at Brooks <br /> <br />Tabled until the regular meeting of. the Planning Commission on February 1, 1961. <br /> <br />VACATION OF ALLEY <br /> <br />Blk. 1, Tschida's Plat and Blk. 2, Weides Addition <br /> <br />Howard Cox, 747 W. Grandv1ew, appeared in favor ot vacating the alle}'B with the property <br />reverting to the adjoining property owners I>> <br /> <br />Herbert Gish, 1" w. Grandv1ew. presented photos to the Commission. showing the eastowest <br />~1.leys, between County Road B-2 and Grandv1ew Avenue, GrandView and 10",,11 Avenues~ and <br />o.CO__ lDwU and Cope Avenueso <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br /> <br />