pm_610705 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~3= 7...61-56 Rosedale Addition Hoo :3 - Roselmm and Cleveland Avenues" No one appeared :in support or the plato Soik8 movedt SWanson seoonded that the pro1Jm1nary' plat of RosedB.le Addition be continued at our regular rneeting schedu1ad for August 2, 19610 Carried unan1mous~" Secret.a.r.rls note; ~tters have been sent to the people who submitted the pre1iminar.1 plats of De\v, Kramer and Rosed41e Addition requesting them to arrange to attend our next meeting in support of their plats" 7-61...6.5 St" AntbolV Plaza Pla~ Moo 2- Highway No" 8 and County Road D. ~nd Kroiss fqJpOrtod the prel1m1nar;r plato A portion of the property oovered by this plat was des1gna.ted as part of the overall parks plano Dahlgren advised that the proposed park site is better suited, but that the 4 acres of land owned by Oust Braham is aocoptabm as an alternate site" Soike JJ20ved, Swanson seconded that we recOJIIInend approval of st" Anthony Plaza Plat Noo 2 providing ,that :wt 18, Block 1 is ,dedicated for acoess purposes to the alternate park site" It is also recommen,ded that the parks plan be ~nded to move the proposed park site to an alternate loca- tion 8bawn on the sketch attached to the planning report" Carried npAnimau~" 7 -6J..-UJ located beween Jerome IDftsgaarden, attarne~1 and Tom Hodne of Oommunity Planning &. Design Assooiates, Inco, supported 'We requesto ltro loftsgaarden indioated that the bti)tUng plan wns revised to eJJm1nate the t1re shop" Ue also read letters frorn the owners of the Rose Vista Apar1mants, RaT !ro18e Const..ruct1Qn ~ ~ the Iex1ngton Holding Comparv indicating the;r have no objeotions to' the variances in setback requirements or the proposed ~lopment for the property" Boike moved, ameman S800ndedt:at we advise the Village Council that the plan presented at tl1e meeting lves substantial changes which appear to be beyond that whioh was requested ,in, the original petition, and that just consideration oannot be given on' the part of the P:l.anning Commission without oi'terin8 a hearil16 which can be attended by the affeoted property ownarso The Oommission, however, considers the revised plan to have ~t and the conditions agreed to by Mr. Krannak are, acceptable" p!OVided that the perpetual publ1o. use easement is widened !rom 32 to 44 feet and the Southerly most access lane 18 widened from 18 to 24 teeto C8.1".t'ied unan1maus~"