pm_650303 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Meeting Roseville Planning Commission Regular Meeting - March 3, 1965 - 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Nelson, Membrez, Anderson, Linebarger, Soike, Lund. Also present: Grauel, Trustee and Planning Consultant Dahlgren and Public Works Director Odland. Anderson moved, Soike seconded, that minutes of the regular meeting of February 3, 1965, be approved as submitted. Carried by a unanimous vote. File 251-65 - Request for rezoning from I-I to 1-2 and special use permit by Bruce Motor Freight, Inc. Mr. R. J. Courtney, Terminal manager of Bruce Motor stated they were preparing for an expansion of their operation and the fact that they are operating in an unconforming use, they wanted the proper zoning 1-2 to apply on their property. He further stated they had no definite plans as yet for the expansion. The consensus of opinion was that a change in the zoning was proper but the approval of a special use permit could not be considered at this time because plans of any kind were not submitted. Mr. Courtney withdrew his request for a special use permit. It was finally moved by Anderson, seconded by Soike to recommend the rezoning from 1-1 to 1-2 and that we accept the withdrawal of the petitioners request for a special use permit at this time. Roll Call, Ayes (5) - Nays (0), Abstention - (I), Nelson abstaining. File 252-65 Rezoning request from R-l to R-3 from Roberts Construction Company. Mr. Daubney, representing the petitioner, stated that four buildings with each 29 I-bedroom unit is proposed to be constructed on this site. A proposed site develop- ment plan was submitted but no application has been made to approve such a plan. Actually the requested rezoning was the legal question but it is presumed that the actual development would have to be preceded by either the submission of a planned development proposal or a plat. A few residents attended the meeting and except one who declared he was opposed to the rezoning, the others were not opposed. They inquired about access, right-of-ways, etc. Mrs. Schosser, owner of property to the north, expressed her desire not to extend Marion Street to South McCarrons Boulevard. In his presentation and as the proposed plan showed, the petitioner agreed to dedicate the east 30 feet of Galtier and also dedicate the west 30 feet of Marion Street in a northerly direction to the end of his property. Planning Consultant Dahlgren reported there was an error in the publication of legal notices resulting in the question as to whether or not a new public hearing would have to be rescheduled. After due consider- ation, Linebarger moved, seconded by Nelson that we recommend the rezoning request and that we give notice to the Village Council of the error in the legal description so that it can make a determination on this matter; the question being - should the commission hold another Public Hearing with the correct legal description. Carried by a unanimous vote. File 253-65 - Western Oil Company special use permit, property at southwest corner of Long Lake Road and County Road C. No one representing the Western Oil Company was present to submit their plans, therefore, Nelson moved, seconded by Soike to continue the hearing at the April 7th meeting. Carried by a unanimous vote. File 254-65 - Stenger Preliminary Plat, 591 Transit Avenue. Mr. Suchy, son-in-law of Stenger, presented this preliminary plat. At the east end of Transit there is a T type turnaround. This kind of turnaround has never been very satisfactory from the standpoint of maintaining the streets and it was suggested that a regular cul-de-sac be considered. It was pointed out, also, that the lot frontage was less than the minimum required in the ordinance but considering other lots of 75 feet in the neighborhood, a variance could be favorably considered. After due consider- ation Anderson moved, seconded by Soike that the preliminary plat be recommended on the condition that the owner dedicate the north half for a 120 diameter cul-de-sac to replace the T type turnaround at the east end of Transit Avenue. Roll Call, Ayes (5) - Nays (1), Membrez voting nay.