pm_651103 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Meeting = Roseville Planning Commission Wednesday, November 3>> 1965 = 7:30 PoMo Members present: Jim Nelson, RemsburgJ Linebarger, Anderson and Membrezo Also present: Lo Odland, Trustee Grauel and Planner Dahlgreno On motion by AndersonJ seconded by Linebarger the minutes of the meeting of October 6, 1965, were approved as submitted by a unanimous voteo File 271-65 ~ Request by Ferdinand Bucher for a special use permit and approval of a preliminary plat, property at Western Avenue and South Owasso Boulevardo Mro Daubney, attorney representing Mro BucherJ submitted the preliminary plat and quoted some figures of the gravel they propose to haul away from the propertYD an estimte of approximately 200,000 cubic yards 0 After considering the matter very thoroughly, Nelson moved, Remsburg seconded that the special permit to haul gravel and the preliminary plat approval be deniedo It was the consensus of opinion that the main difficulty was the lack of information pertaining to the hauling of the sand and gravel from the propertyo There was concern about the great amount of material, estimated at 20Q,OOO cubic yards to be hauled away, approximately 20,000 truck loads 0 This would create an unusual amount of traffic causing wear and tear to the streets, noise and dust to the residents along the travelled streetso It was felt that the property could be developed with less material to be hauled away and that the developers could very well come up with a more desirable pIano File 296-65 Special use permit requested by Dro Clarence Siegel, 2980 North Snelling Aveo There being no one present at the meeting to give some information for the reason of this request, Nelson moved, Anderson seconded, to lay the matter over to the next regular meeting on December lsto Roll call, unanimous 0 File 295-65 Rezoning request from R=l to R~3 from Cleon Garley, property at the south= east corner of Lexington Avenue and Judith Avenue 0 Mro Garley proposed to construct an apartment building with 12 2=bedroom units. requiring an area of land of 30.000 square feet 0 The subject property has only 29,760 feet 0 After due consideration Nelson moved, Anderson seconded, to recommend that the request be deniedo Roll Call, unanimous 0 The Planning Commission felt this request could very well be considered a "spot zoning" 0 Fi Ie 298-65 Request for a division of a lot by Austin To McDonough, location of property south of County Road C-2D east of Oxford Streeto If this request was grantedD the subject property may create problems in the future development of other properties in the areao The subject property has a frontage of 20608 feet on County Road "C" with a depth of 301059 feet, the request was to make 2 lots with a frontage of 103 feet each on County Road C-2o The Planning Consultant recommended that the block in which the subject property is located should have a street; north-south in the center to develop the rear portions of these extremely deep lotso The applicant was reluctant to dedicate 60 feet of this pro= posed and indicated he would rather make 2 lots facing County Road C=2o