pm_660504 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Meeting e Roseville Planning Commission Wednesday, May 4, 1966 - 7:30 P.M. Members present: Linebarger, Remsburg, Anderson, Nelson, Carpenter, Pope and Membrez. On motion by Anderson, Seconded, by Carpenter, the minutes of the regular meeting of April 6, the special meetings of April 18 and April 25, were approved as submitted by a unanimous vote. Subject File 316-66 - Rezoning request from R-l to 1-1 to 1-2 from Minnesota Transfer of the property north of County Road C-2 and S.E. of new Highway 8. Mr. Newcombe, attorney for Minnesota Transfer Railway, read a lengthy report giving reasons why the request for the rezoning should be granted. He stated that they no longer wish to zone the property to 1-2, after studying the matter they agreed I-I would be adequate. Mr. Newcombe's report is on file at the Village Office. Mr. Bannon, General Manager and Mr. Jenson, Engineer of Minnesota Transfer were also present. The opposition led by Dr. Robert Jackson, resident, and Richard Merrill, attorney, could not agree that the property should be rezoned, the main reason was a loss of value of the single residences within the area and the P.H.A.'s policy to refuse to approve loans of homes located near the industria.! properties. Dr. Jackson made the suggestion that Minnesot~ Transfer should establish a 200 foot buffer between single residences and Industria~ zoning. After due consideration Anderson moved, Carpenter seconded, that we recommend the approval of the rezoning, except the parcel at the southwest corner, approximately 150' x 300' which is to remain R-l. Roll Call: unanimous. Subject File 314-66 e Rezoning request from ReI to R-3 and approval of Residential Development Plan submitted by O'Dell-Peterson Realtors for the property on Cleveland Avenue, south of County Road D. Mr. O'Dell submitted some sketches of the proposed apartment buildings to be constructed on this site. He stated the buildings will contain 30 1 bedroom units and 42 two bedroom units, the rental to be from $145.00 to $165.00. There were several residents opposing this request and a petition of signatures was given to the Planning Commission indicating they were all opposed to a change in zoning. The main objection was a loss of value of the single residences and the health and safety of the children. After due consideration, Anderson moved, Remsburg seconded, to lay the matter over to the next regular meeting because of the many unsolved problems in the area, namely: I. Drainage 2. Conformity to the proposed regulations in terms of density, parking accommodations and the construction of tile garages. Roll Call: unanimous.