pm_710203 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Meeting Wednesday, February 3, 1971 The February 3, 1971, meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman ~fembrez at 7:35 PoMo Members present~ Kellett, Demos, Johnson, Edlund and ~fembrezo Pope arrived at 7:40 PoMo ~fembers absent: Eagles Others present: Councilman Albert Grauel, Pub lic Works Director Sherman Goldberg, Midwest Planning representative Dick Dyne11 and Administrative Assistant Steve North Mro Johnson ~foved and Mro Kellett seconded, that the minutes of the meeting of December 2, 1970, be approved with the following amendment: "Page 5, Paragraph 8, which includes the motion directing Midwest Planning to study the Planned Unit Development concepto 0 00 add the following: "Mrs. Demos voted Nay on the motion because she felt it unnecessary for Midwest Planning to request the Minnesota Society of Architects for their opinion ,however, she favored the general intent of the motion" 0 Ro 11 Call, Ayes: Kellett, Demos, Johnson, Edlund, Membrezo Nays: Noneo Planning File 592=70 ~ Richard Coverdale request for rezoning from R~l to R=2 at 1760 North Hamline Avenue Mro ~fembrez indicated that this application had been laid over from the last Planning Commission meeting, pending receipt of a report from ~fidwest Planning regarding the requir- ing of design plans for proposed two unit family dwellingso Mro ~1embrez stated that the report had been received and that the Commission shmlld take action on the recommendation. Present ation Mro Coverdale stated that he had made the application for rezoning last .July and felt that he was entitled to a decision, He indicated that he had fulfilled the requirements expected of him and desired that he receive just considerationo Discussion Mr, Edlund stated that the basic problem was that the Commission had no way, at present, of assuring that the applicant would complete the construction as outlined to the CommissiOJ Mro .Johnson pointed out that if Mr, Coverdale should not proceed with his project after having been granted the re zoning, that another party could construct a doub Ie house of any design without even appearing before the Commissiono Mro Membrez stated that, in his opinion, this project would certainly be beneficial to that area of Hamline Avenue 0 ~lro Coverdale indicated his willingness to withdraw the request for rezoning of the three lots on Dellwood and request only the rezoning on the four lots bordering Hamlineo Mro McGrath, 1800 North Ham line , was in favor of the proposed rezoning for the construction of double bungeIowso ~frs 0 Ui1liger, 1811 North Hamline, felt that doub Ie bungelows would certainly improve the annearance of the area and was in favor of the rezoninl!o Mt'. .Johnson exm'essed his onnosition to the rezoning on Dellwood and appreciated