Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'1ospville PlanTlinr': CO:'1T'1issio"1 <br />I Tednes,lay , ;'fay .s, 197:' <br /> <br />ihe Nay 5, 1976, regular meeting of the Roseville Plan.fling Commission was called to <br />order by Chairman V. Johnson at 7:3() P.M. <br /> <br />Members present: Kellett, Rukavina, 'rastel, SiY'1ons, Cushing and V. Johnson. <br /> <br />Members absent: G. Johnson <br /> <br />Others present: Cmmcil liaison Albert Grauel, Howard Dahlgren, Terry Kramer and <br />Steve North <br /> <br />Approval of t-1inutes <br /> <br />Mr. Rukavina moved and Hr. ;'1astel seconded, that the minutes of the regular meeting <br />of April 7, 1976, be approved. PDll Call, Ayes: Kellett, Rw,avina, Mastel, Simons, <br />O.1shing and V. Johnson. 1Ilays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 965 <br /> <br />- Allied Stores and ~1. it Development Corporation request for <br />rezoning from B-1 and I-I to B-1 and B-l-B, special use permit, <br />preliminary plat and variance to number of parking spaces and <br />sign size at 1750 West Highway 36. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. George Johnson, Attorney representing Allied Stores, indicated that they had <br />requested the City Council to refer their application back to the Planning Commission <br />for further consideration. He stated that Allied at the previous Planning Commission <br />meeting had indicated their willingness to sign a declaration which would be attached <br />to the deed on the west 8 acres of the property, limiting the use to B-1. Allied is <br />now willing to sign a similar declaration relating to the three acres on the southeast <br />portion of the property, south of the proposed LaBelle's development. He indicated <br />that these declarations would permanently bind the use of all the property to B-1, <br />except for the seven acres proposed for the LaBelle's development which would he B-I-B. <br />He stated that at the last Planning Commission meeting the question was raised regarding <br />retail uses south of Highway 36. Allied Stores feels th:;1t the precedent has already <br />been set for retail use south of 36 and west of Snelling. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson saw three possible options on the future of the property: <br /> <br />1. Grant the rezoning on the property as requested. <br />2. Leave zoning as is and the property would be developed for industrial uses. <br />3. Agree to the urging of the residents and leave the property vacant which <br />would mean that it must be purchased by the City. <br /> <br />He stated that some action is necessary. The cost of carrying the property is substantial <br />and the property owner cannot afford to do it. Mr. Dick Olarnp, Vice President, Allied <br />Stores, indicated that Allied is at the point where it is no longer economically feasible <br />to hold the property. He stated that if this plan is not approved he will have to <br />recommend to their real estate division that the property must be used and that they <br />cannot hold on to it any longer. He felt that it was unrealistic to expect the residents <br />in the area to favor the project. They obviously would prefer that it remain vacant. <br />