pm_790502 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-3- Mr. Michels comrented that he would build the house on the lot as he proposed in his site plan. Mr. Ed Sal verda indicated that Mr. George Reiling, awner of the property across Dale Street, had also indicated that he favored the rezoning. Mr. Mastel indicated that he felt as comfortable with this rezoning as he did with the one proposed by Michels Construction Company on County Road B-2 and lexington. He stated he saw very little difference between a double house and a single family house and felt they mixed very well. Mr. V. Johnson indicated that he felt this was a policy decision and that the Planning Comnission should be basing its decision on the planning aspects. He indicated that he had heard no sound reasons why the property should be rezoned from R-l to R-2. Fecomrendation Mr. Mastel rroved and Mrs. Cushing seconded, that the Comnission recomrend approval of Robert Michels request for rezoning from R-l to R-2 and division of lot at 634 West County Road C. Roll Call, Ayes: Mastel, SiIrons, Dressler, Rukavina, Cushing and G. Johnson. Nays: V. Johnson. Planning File 1187 - Albert Bruckner request for division of lot at 523 Roselawn Presentation Mr. Dahlgren indicated that the Bruckner's have awned this parcel for many years. He indicated that th~propose to divide the property and retain awnership of a portion, where their hone is located, fronting on Roselawn Avenue. The remainder of the property will be purchased by the Jacksons who live to the north of the Bruckner property. Mr. Dahlgren stated that the property directly to the west of the Bruckner property had been divided a few years ago. At that tiIre, because of the steep grades in the area, a proposed plan had been prepared on how the property in the area, including the Bruckners, could be developed. Mr. Dahlgren comrented that the proposed division by the Bruckners would fit in with hav the property could be developed. Discussion Mr. Torgenson, 515 Roselawn, indicated that his property was involved if the future platting of lots were to be done as suggested by Mr. Dahlgren. He was concerned about the future assessments for the streets and utili ties. Mr. McGuire indicated that it was possible that Mr. Torgenson would be assessed if the street were ever constructed',' but that was sonething the property awners could work out as to how the assessrrents would be made. Mr. V. Johnson indicated that the Corrmission was considering only the proposed division at this tine. If there were any applications made for platting or for develop- nent of the property, Mr. Torgerson would be notified of the public hearing. Mrs. Jackson indicated that she intends to retain the property as it is.