pm_800806 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes Wednesday, August 6, 1980 The August 6, 1980, regular meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman V. Johnson at 7:30 P.M. Members present: Members absent: Staff present: Dressler, G. Johnson, Rukavina, Simons and V. Johnson. Cushing and Mastel Council liaison Al Kehr, Howard Dahlgren, Bob Ryan, Dave Drown and Steve North Approval of Minutes Mr. Rukavina moved and Mr. Simons seconded, that the minutes of the regular meeting of July 2, 1980, be approved. Roll Call, Ayes: Dressler, G. Johnson, Rukavina and Simons. Nays: None. Abstention: V. Johnson because he was absent from the meeting. Planning File 1266 - James Suchy request for division of lot at 1000 Burke Avenue Presentation Mr. Dahlgren indicated that the applicant proposes to divide an existing lot which has 87 feet of frontage on both Burke and Parker Avenues with a depth of 428 feet. The two new lots would each contain over 18,000 square feet. The proposed division is also in keeping with other lot divisions in the area. Mr. Dahlgren indicated that the City is requesting a 30 foot dedication of rig~t-of-way for Burke Avenue. The app1iaant stated she thought the dedication had been made several years ago, but that if it had not, she would be willing to do so. Recommendation Mr. G. Johnson moved and Mr. Rukavina seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of James Suchy's request for division of lot at 1000 Burke Avenue with the condition that 30 feet of additional right-of-way be dedicated for Burke Avenue if it has not been previously dedicated. Roll Call, Ayes: Dressler, G. Johnson, Rukavina, Simons and V. Johnson. Nays: None. Planning File 1264 - Proposed Ordinance Defining Certain Permitted and Special Uses in the R-1 zoning district and adding criteria for issuance of special use permits in all zoning districts Presentation Mr. North indicated that there have been continuing discussions with the School District regarding the proposed ordinance. He commented that because of a question regarding the City's authority to regulate uses of school property through its zoning powers, an attorney general's opinion will be requested. He recommended that consideration of the ordinance be continued until the next meet- ing. Recommendation Mr. Rukavina moved and Mrs. Dressler seconded, that the proposed ordinance defining certain permitted and special uses in the R-l zoning district and adding criteria for issuances of special use permits in all zoning districts be continued