pm_850807 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Meeting August 7, 1985 Page 2 Mr. Wiski reconfirmed Mr. Drown's previous assessment figure on the parcel, and the applicant informed the Commission there was an escrow check now in place. Mr. Wiski also stated that an easement was needed, and that it currently wasn't recorded. The applicant said that he would dedicate said easement as required. Mr. Drown pointed out that the pond to the South is needed for drainage, thus the City would like an easement to the wet area of said pond. The applicant replied that this would not be a problem. Ms. Dressler asked whether the property would be rented or owned. The applicant replied that both will be for sale. Recommendation Mr. Matson moved, seconded by DeBenedet, that the rezoning from R-l to R-2 and lot split be approved as per submitted plans. Roll Call: Ayes: Nays: Johnson, Dressler, Matson, Mueller, DeBenedet, and Wiski None Planning File 1604 Con/Spec Corporation, Rezoning from R-l to R-2, Special Use Permit for PUD, and Variance to Lower Area. Northeast Wagner Place. Presentation Mr. Dahlgren discussed the project and the contiguous land use in the area, particularly the Southern nonconforming use. The site is currently zoned R-l. This site was originally proposed for duplex development; however, this request was denied as a result of the common driveway negatively impacting the single family adjacent to the property, and as a result of the height of the proposed buildings. The developer has now moved the common driveway away from the single family home, and is directing it between the respective structures. Mr. Drown stated that the plat for this parcel has not been filed yet, and it should be forthcoming. Mr. Drown also pointed out that documentation was needed for maintenance and snow removal purposes. Sewer service will also need to be constructed in the area. Mr. C. R. Hackworthy subsequently made a presentation regarding the project. He pointed out that originally he was looking at single family housing; however, the trees in the area simply could not be saved as a result of that particular approach. Through the use of his three duplex proposal, a significant number of trees can be saved. Mr. Jensen, the architect for the project, subsequently discussed the modifications that were made in the project relating to housing type, height, and significant traffic modifications. Mr. Jensen also discussed his canvasing of the neighborhood, in which he maintained that only three of the fifteen neighbors were opposed.