pm_851002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes October 2, 1985 Page 6 Demos asked how fire access was going to be provided for the northwest and southwest sectors of the development. Thompson pointed out that the Fire Marshal was confident that the Hammerhead driveway could address their concerns, and they could possibly eliminate the canopy. He also stated they are more than willing to work with the Fire Marshal to meet all of his concerns. Nielson asked what the setback requirement was. Thompson replied seventy feet. Nielson asked what the berm to the existing structure was going to do to the water. Thompson replied that the berm will not move the water to the south, and all the water will be contained on the site. Demos also stated that this particular area is in the Grass Lake Watershed. Drown again emphasized that the water problem should be easy to deal with. Nielson asked about the potential contamination of the water from X the Williams area. Goldstein replied that as part of their contract, they have given Williams permission to install two test wells. A resident asked if the water was contaminated, where would it go. Drown replied the drains are already in the area and, therefore, after the development is in there would be no change with respect to where the water is drained. Neilson asked about the contamination issue, and how can the City push PCA in this whole issue. Demos replied that the City Council can encourage the PCA to move forward with dispatch. Mildred McGiffin, of 1379 Brooks, asked how high the building is with the garage. Thompson replied three stories. (Resident) asked how the exhaust would be handled in the parking area. Thompson replied that the garage would be totally enclosed, thus there would be no noise, and the exhaust would be handled mechanically, straight up, not directed towards the south. Wiski asked whether the developers would agree to no exhaust or condensers to the south, and Goldstein stated the developers would support that. Mildred McGiffin, of 1379 Brooks, asked that the developers do meet on the south landscape concerns. Neilson also asked when these types of concerns would be resolved. Wiski stated that the major issues would be settled first, and the other items would be conditioned and often times handled through agreement with the neighbors and administratively with the staff. Mrs. Anderson, of 2499 Sheldon, asked how deliveries were going to be handled, and how many meals per day would be served there. Thompson stated again all of the traffic would be handled within their interior traffic pattern. Hanson replied that one meal per day would be served if they wanted to eat at that meal.