pm_870902 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, September 2, 1987 The September 2, 1987, regular meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Pat Johnson at 7:30 p.m. Members Present: Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, and Moeller. Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Waldron, Dahlgren, Janisch, and Bierscheid. Council Present: Cushman (liaison) and Kehr. Approval of Minutes Berry moved, DeBenedet seconded, that the minutes of meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission held August 5, 1987, be approved. the regular Wednesday, Roll Call, Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, and DeBenedet. None. Moeller and Goedeke, because they were not present at that meeting. Planning File 1787 Gerald Kaufhold request for rezoning, Comprehensive Plan Amend- ment, preliminary plat, and variance at 1130 County Road B. Presentation Mr. Dahlgren discussed the site which is approximately 8.5 acres, and is zoned R-1. He pointed out that the request entails a Comprehesive Plan Amendment, a plat, and rezoning from R-1 to B-2 and B-3. Mr. Dahlgren discussed the right-of-way which would be required pursuant to the County's plans. Dahlgren pointed out that the variance was needed for the parking on the north side of the facility, which is currently nonconforming. Mr. Dahlgren also proceeded to briefly discuss the previous proposals that have been submitted. Tom Dunwell, Kaufhold's architect, proceeded to summarize Kaufhold's development and his expansion needs in the area. Dr. Worner, from the School District, discussed the School's perspective relating to the site. Worner pointed out that the School has excess property that it simply needs to sell, and reinvest the proceeds into capital improvements in other school district facilities. Worner pointed out that the School Board will continue to work with the Planning Commission and City Council with respect to sales of School Board property. Dunwell then continued his discussion of the various alterna- tives, particularly in light of the City Council's previous positions regarding the site. The latest proposal included a plan with an ilL" shaped park, a one-story office versus a three- story, and B-2 zoning in a number of areas as opposed to the originally requested B-3.