My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_870902
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1987
>
pm_870902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:50 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/2/1987
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />September 2, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Worner replied it would be extremely difficult to separate the <br />parcels. He pointed out that this is a negotiating process that <br />should occur between the developer, Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br /> <br />Everhart and <br />didn't divide <br />replied that <br />property as a <br /> <br />Betty McNulty asked why the School District simply <br />the property in half, and not sell the park. Worner <br />the School District simply decided to market the <br />total package. <br /> <br />Unidentified resident stated that it was not appropriate for a <br />School District to be selling off its assets. <br /> <br />Johnson proceeded to thank Worner for his input, and proceeded to <br />point out that the number of questions that were currently being <br />discussed were more appropriate for a School Board meeting as <br />opposed to the issue that was formally before the Planning Com- <br />mission. <br /> <br />Maschka stated, in his opinion, it was financially feasible to <br />subdivide the area to the north as commercial and still facili- <br />tate a very lucrative deal. <br /> <br />Bonnie Wilkins asked whether she could rezone her house based on <br />a new appraisal. Johnson replied that she could certainly <br />formally present an application and have it considered, but that <br />it would be compared to the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Wilkins asked as to whether the School District would receive <br />preferential treatment. Johnson replied that the School District <br />would not be treated any different from any other application. <br /> <br />Mark Badis, 1413 West Lexington, stated his concerns about the <br />significant changes that were occurring in the area, and that the <br />residential areas are being utilized for commercial. He cited <br />the expansions of Har Mar, Lexington Plaza Shoppes, and Hamline <br />Avenue as examples. <br /> <br />Maschka pointed out that Hamline was not a proper analogy, as the <br />Planning Commission and City Council did not approve a project <br />that would have eliminated housing. <br /> <br />Tom Turba read a letter for the citizens into the record, which <br />is attached and part of the minutes. <br /> <br />Mrs. Bakeman proceeded to make a presentation regarding commer- <br />cial development in the area, and stated her concern that this <br />project simply should not be approved based on its extensive <br />impact to the neighborhood and surrounding area. <br /> <br />Frank Rog pointed out that as Parks and Recreation Director for <br />the City for the past twenty-seven years, it was his opinion that <br />this area should not be sold, but should be bought as a recrea- <br />tion area for the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.