Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />October 7, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked what the sign limitations were <br />Dahlgren replied that they are allowed one pylon, <br />particular monument sign is put up, that is the <br />signing that can be requested. <br /> <br />on the <br />but if <br />extent of <br /> <br />site. <br />this <br />the <br /> <br />Stokes asked whether the sign was lit. The Villa Park represen- <br />tative replied that ground lights operating off photo cells would <br />be utilized. <br /> <br />Muller (audience) asked as to whether the sign or existing tree <br />would obstruct traffic. The Villa Park representative replied <br />that he would be willing to move the evergreen if it created a <br />traffic problem. <br /> <br />Nancy Reiter, 3106 North Victoria, asked as to whether the last <br />leg of this development was properly approved. Johnson replied <br />that it was properly approved, as the last leg was part of the <br />original plan before the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Dahlgren stated that the site plan was adjusted and the height <br />was reduced based on its original intensity. <br /> <br />Berry moved, DeBenedet seconded, that the Villa Park (Housing <br />Alliance) request for variance at 500 West County Road B be <br />approved with the following condition: <br /> <br />1. That the required sidewalk easement be granted to the City. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />Cushman asked about the existing tree, and could shrubs be placed <br />around the sign. The Villa Park representative replied that <br />there is potential for flower beds around the sign. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that he was not convinced that the tree would be <br />a problem. <br /> <br />Johnson replied that one would need to consider growth of the <br />tree as it relates to the visibility in the area. <br /> <br />Stokes moved, Maschka seconded, an amendment to the motion that <br />would require removal of the adjacent tree. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: <br />Nays: <br /> <br />Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, and Goedeke. <br />DeBenedet and Moeller. <br /> <br />Roll Call on amended motion: <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, <br />Goedeke and Moeller. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Other Business <br />DeBenedet stated that the Planning Commission should consider and <br />discuss architectural standards. Dahlgren replied that this was <br />an item that he would be bringing up at a joint Council/Planning <br />Corrunission session. <br />