My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_871104
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1987
>
pm_871104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:51 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/4/1987
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Wednesday, November 4, 1987 <br /> <br />The November 4, 1987, regular meeting of the Roseville Planning <br />Commission was called to order by Chairperson Pat Johnson at 7:30 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Members Present: Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, <br />Goedeke, and Moeller. <br /> <br />Members Absent: None. <br /> <br />Staff Present: Waldron, Dahlgren, and Janisch. <br /> <br />Council Present: Cushman (liaison) and Kehr. <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br />Godeke moved, DeBenedet seconded, that the minutes of <br />meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission held <br />October 7, 1987, be approved. <br /> <br />the regular <br />Wednesday, <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, <br />Goedeke and Moeller. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1799 <br />Outcomes, Inc. request for variance at 388 Oakcrest Avenue. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Mr. Dahlgren showed the area where the <br />Essentially, a fence can only be four feet <br />within thirty feet of a public right-of-way. <br />requesting a six foot fence on the east <br />Western, which would facilitate the foster <br />the site relating to autistic children. <br /> <br />fence is proposed. <br />in height when it is <br />The applicants are <br />side, adjacent to <br />home activities on <br /> <br />Dahlgren pointed out that this should have been a minor variance; <br />however, one of the impacted neighbors would not sign off on the <br />proposed minor variance. <br /> <br />Goedeke commended the applicants for helping autistic children. <br />He stated he looked at the site and did not think the fence would <br />be a problem, particularly in view of the fact that outside <br />influence bothers autistic children. He did ask, however, why an <br />adjacent gate to another property was open. The applicants <br />replied that the kids are watched very closely and even if the <br />gate was open, they were under a watchful eye. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked whether the fence does need to be located on the <br />right-of-way line. The applicants replied that they are simply <br />placing the fence where an old one previously existed. <br /> <br />Berry asked why a six foot high fence is not being considered to <br />the south. The applicants replied that the shrubs provided <br />adequate protection; however, at some point in time they would <br />like a six foot fence to the south also. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.