Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget 2 <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 13, 1988 <br /> <br />and landscaping breaks up and softens the appearance of the <br />building. Finneman testified that the front of the building <br />would be totally brick, while the back storage buildings would <br />have color impregnated brick embossed block with brick bands. <br />Finneman stated that the brick embossed block would reduce the <br />cost by 120 to 180 thousand dollars which is important to the <br />project. <br /> <br />Maschka inquired whether the block would be color impregnated or <br />painted and what the life expectancy of the block would be. <br />Finneman responded that it would be color impregnated block and <br />that the life expectancy of the block would be close to that of a <br />brick veneer on block construction. <br /> <br />Johnson asked for clarification of the policy concerning similar <br />materials on all four sides of the building. Dahlgren responded <br />that the city's policy was to maintain quality on all four sides <br />of the building. <br /> <br />Johnson asked Dahlgren for an opinion whether or not the <br />materials proposed meet the ordinance standards. Dahlgren <br />requested clarification of the materials and their location. <br />Finneman summarized the building materials and locations. <br />Dahlgren indicated that he was concerned about the materials, and <br />that the city should have a location and types of materials <br />specified in writing because he was not clear on what material <br />would be located where. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that in her opinion the proposal was not <br />consistent with the policy for the same materials on all four <br />sides. <br /> <br />DeBenedet expressed concern about the drainage plan not being <br />finalized or permission not being obtained from the railroad. <br /> <br />Norris Brevick, a civil engineer, explained the drainage plan. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if watershed district approval had been obtained. <br />Brevick responded that it had been submitted to Rice Creek, but <br />not approved. Brevick also stated that this was the type of <br />solution they were looking for. <br /> <br />Keel inquired about what keeps the water out of the ditch along <br />County Road C. Brevick indicated that there was nothing to keep <br />it out of the ditch because the ditch is the only drainage system <br />in the area. <br /> <br />Keel suggested that if the commission were to recommend approval <br />