pm_881005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page#12 Wednesday, October 5, 1988 Johnson stated that the development looks too crowded and inquired if one home could be eliminated. Dahlgren responded that the elimination of one home would up to the developer but that the City could stipulate a ten foot setback in its approval. Berry pointed out that compromises have already been made. The developer has reduced the proposal from mUlti-family and two family development to single family development and has added land onto the proposal. Johnson stated she was troubled about the number of units and wondered if a one month delay might be appropriate to redesign the project. Berry commented that compromises have already been made and that people can't rely on private open space being maintained forever. Berry added that the experience in the city has been that value has not been diminished because of development. Moeller said that he would not support the proposal because he was concerned about the buildable area of the two triangle shaped lots and that there seemed to be too much development on the site. DeBenedet stated that tabling would seem to have some merit that there were a number of questions that still needed answers. DeBenedet moved and Goedeke seconded to continue this matter to November 2, 1988 to allow for the development of an alternate plan and to provide more clear drawings. Johnson indicated she had concerns about delaying the matter but felt that it was important to see if neighborhood concerns could be addressed. DeBenedet stated he was not troubled with some of the proposed setbacks, only the 5 ft. setbacks adjacent to development not in the plat. stokes asked if the developer knew what is expected of him. Mattke stated that the building footprints should be changed to adjust setbacks. Johnson pointed out that the developer should consider other changes and relook at the whole proposal.