My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_890104
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1989
>
pm_890104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:00 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:38:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/4/1989
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page# 2 <br /> <br />Wednesday, January 4, 1989 <br /> <br />Belair Builders request for rezoning from I-1 to I-2, special use <br />permi ts for a planned unit development, truck rental agency, <br />commercial truck wash, and variance to parking setback, curbing, <br />fence height requirements at 2211 County Road C2. <br /> <br />Berry moved, Maschka seconded to continue consideration of this <br />item to February 1, 1989. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Maschka, Moeller, DeBenedet, <br />Goedeke, Stokes, Johnson <br /> <br />Berry, <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Planninq 1874 <br /> <br />Ordinance revision concerning outside merchandising and display. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the existing ordinance requirements, the <br />research that City staff has done and highlighted a proposed <br />ordinance amendment. Dahlgren stated a concern about the <br />fairness of singling out only hardware and service stations when <br />other similar type uses may also have been needed for outside <br />merchandising and display. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked why the provision was in the new ordinance <br />allowing a single piece of equipment to be displayed away from <br />the building. Jopke responded that he believed that this was <br />based on a request by a hardware store which occasionally <br />displays a piece of equipment in such a manner. <br /> <br />Maschka inquired if the five percent limitation should be <br />increased. <br /> <br />Berry questioned what the definition of a service station is and <br />pointed out that the definition might only include stations that <br />offer service and repair and not the self service convenience <br />store with gas pumps. <br /> <br />Dahlgren pointed out that in Roseville, service stations are <br />regulated by special use permit while the food sales part of the <br />uses are permitted under the current ordinance. <br /> <br />DeBenedet pointed out that the current service station definition <br />in the code covers any kind of use selling gasoline or fuel. <br />DeBenedet added that hardware store is not defined, however. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.