pm_890301 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page# 5 Wednesday, March 1, 1989 DeBenedet moved and Berry seconded to continue this matter to April 5, 1989. Stokes questioned the purpose of the continuance. DeBenedet stated that the purpose would be to provide accurate survey information and give the applicant the opportunity to respond to the issues that were brought up at the Commission. stokes questioned if the applicant needed a survey to do that. DeBenedet stated that an accurate house location would be necessary. Johnson added that the continuance also gives the applicant the opportunity to respond to the issues that were brought up at the Commission meeting. Goedeke stated that the proposal is so close to the minimum that even being off a foot makes a difference. Berry stated that in view of the drainage comments, drainage should also be looked at. Roll Call: Ayes: DeBenedet, Berry, Goedeke, Moeller, Johnson Stokes, Nays: None Planninq 1874 Ordinance Revision concerning outside merchandising and display. Presentation Dahlgren summarized the proposed criteria and the option of allowing outside merchandising and display either as a permitted use. or a use by special use permit. Johnson stated that she was uncomfortable with the proposal before the special use permit option because of the many different situations which could arise. Johnson added that a special use permit allows each situation to be considered individually and would be more fair. . - DeBenedet stated a concern that the proposed ordinance would open things up beyond what was anticipated and asked if it would difficult to turn down a special use permit.