pm_891004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page# 8 Wednesday, October 4, 1989 are dependent on the others because of the common parking and access at the rear. Dahlgren stated that Dale Street is more than a residential road and it is only fair as development occurs to dedicate additional right-of-way. Dahlgren stated that this is a minimal request which is part of doing business in the city. stokes pointed out that it is the function of the government to protect individuals such as Mr. Reinhardt and that the Commission should approve the motion on the floor. Reinhardt pointed out to the Commission that he purchased the property 8-9 months ago. stokes said that it is an important fact that Mr. Reinhardt has been a good neighbor and that the public should pay for the right-of-way on the north parcel. DeBenedet asked if the amendment could be amended to require that staff report to the Council on the 1979 facts on why the dedication was not required and that an opinion from the City Attorney be obtained regarding the legality of requiring the dedication of the parcel to the north. DeBenedet stated that he wouldn't support the motion because in his opinion, it is not the best advise to the Council. wietecki pointed out that based on rough figures, it would be less expensive for the City to accept the trade off proposed by Mr. Reinhardt concerning providing the dedication in lieu of the sidewalk. Johnson responded that it is the City's policy not to make trades. Roll Call: Ayes: Maschka, Goedeke, Wietecki, Stokes Nays: DeBenedet, Johnson other Business Ordinance changes to implement Design Standards. Dahlgren summarized the status of his review and development of such standards, pointing out that this matter will be brought back to the Commission at its November meeting for additional review and discussion. Johnson read a letter provided by Mr. Jopke concerning questions about the T.J. Maxx and Digby's signs asked by a Commission member at the September meeting.