pm_891101 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Paget 2 Wednesday, November 1, 1989 Roll Call: Ayes: DeBenedet, Goedeke, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, Wietecki, Johnson Nayes: None Planninq File 2027 Liberty Rosewood Limited Partnership request for a sign variance at 2750 victoria street. Presentation Dahlgren summarized location history and the proposed sign variance. Dahlgren pointed out that the variance would seem to be appropriate in conjunction with the other variances that have been granted for the proposal with the condition that the lights for the sign not be located within the public right-of-way. Johnson read a letter opposing the sign variance. Eric Engh explained that the reason the sign has been installed was because of time constraints for the proj ect and that they have designed the lighting for the sign to try not to beam into the residences. Berry pointed out that the lighting would be buried in snow in the winter and asked if the applicant had considered eliminating the lights. Engh replied that the owners want the sign lit and that it would be far enough from the road to avoid heavy snows. Johnson suggested that they consider an internally lit sign. Maschka questioned how far the lights were into the right-of-way. Engh replied approximately six feet. Goedeke asked if the lights were over the storm sewer and who would bear the expense of removal if there was a problem with the storm sewer. Engh replied stuart Corporation or Liberty Rosewood Limited Partnership. Keel pointed out that the lights are not allowed in the code to be on the right-of-way unless there would some kind of easement. Goedeke asked where storm sewers were located. Keel replied on the property line and that the sign and lights were not over the storm sewer. Goedeke pointed out that residential property owners are not allowed to place things in the right-of-way and that the same restrictions should be applied here. Goedeke added that he was