Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page#12 <br /> <br />Wednesday, June 6, 1990 <br /> <br />Keel stated that MNDOT can't deny access but that they held the <br />applicant hostage based on a drainage permit. <br /> <br />DeBenedet testified that the project is the same as before with <br />major or minor changes depending on where you live. DeBenedet <br />added that because no variances to standards are being requested, <br />that approval is called for and the only question is what <br />condition should be applied. DeBenedet stated that the <br />pedestrian safety concern should be dealt with. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Berry seconded to recommend approval of <br />Dominion Group Inc.' s request for a special use permit at 2231 <br />Rice street with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the project be developed according to the plans <br />presented to the Planning Commission on June 6, 1990. <br /> <br />2. That staff approve the final landscape plan with <br />neighborhood review. <br /> <br />3. That staff approve final grading, drainage, erosion control, <br />utility and lighting plans. <br /> <br />4. That color renderings and full exterior details be presented <br />to the City Council. <br /> <br />5. That the applicant make a cash contribution for sidewalk <br />from the point of access on Minnesota west to the park <br />pathway with a public hearing for construction of a <br />sidewalk. <br /> <br />6. That there be no access from the project to Marion street. <br /> <br />Shardlow expressed concern about requiring the developer to <br />assume full responsibility for the sidewalk. Shardlow added that <br />it would be appropriate to have a hearing for the city to <br />consider the whole problem and the right share of the property <br />owners to contribute. <br /> <br />Johnson questioned how the appropriate shares are determined. <br /> <br />Shardlow stated that the applicants share must be proportionate <br />to their need or benefit. <br /> <br />DeBenedet testified that if the project were on a street that <br />sidewalks would be required on two sides. DeBenedet added that <br />if the development goes forward, the existing problem would be <br />