My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_911113
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1991
>
pm_911113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:47 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/13/1991
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Wednesday, November 13, 1991 <br /> <br />The November 13, 1991 regular meeting of the Roseville Planning <br />Commission was called to order by Acting Chairperson John Goedeke <br />at 7:30 P.M. <br /> <br />Members Present: <br /> <br />Stokes, Thomas, Roberts, Wietecki, Harms, <br />Goedeke <br /> <br />Members Absent: <br /> <br />DeBenedet <br /> <br />Staff Present: <br /> <br />Shardlow, Keel, Jopke <br /> <br />Council Present: <br /> <br />Thomas <br /> <br />A~proval of Minutes <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />Roberts moved and Stokes seconded to approve the minutes of the <br />October 9, 1991 Planning commission meeting. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Stokes, Thomas, Roberts, Wietecki, <br />Harms, Goedeke <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Hearings <br /> <br />Planninq File 2333 <br /> <br />Mike PlattjFuddruckers request for sign variance at 2740 Snelling <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />PRESENTATION <br /> <br />Shardlow provided the history of the proposal and summarized the <br />changes which have occurred in their request. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Issues discussed included the hardship presented by the sale of the <br />State right-of-way, whether the applicant had the right to expect <br />visibility from Snelling Avenue and County Road C vs. the frontage <br />road, the visibility of the sign from adjacent residential areas, <br />and the amount of variance requested, the comparison of the <br />proposed height to the Holiday Inn sign on Cleveland Avenue, <br />alternate locations for the sign, whether the proposed sign would <br />allow people to identify the site in time to turn on County Road C, <br />and the need to limit the variance to the current operation. <br /> <br />No one from the public spoke on this matter. <br /> <br />MOTION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.