My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_930414
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1993
>
pm_930414
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:02 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/14/1993
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />April 14, 1993 <br /> <br />page# <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />11. The final plans for the future College Building in the <br />northeast corner of the site be designed essentially as shown <br />on the PUD site plan. This means that the use will be for <br />college-related functions for Northwestern College, which <br />might include classrooms, faculty and administrative offices, <br />adult education, radio studio (but not a tower or antenna), <br />student services, or similar uses. It means that there will <br />be adequate parking for the uses on site above and beyond the <br />parking needed for the adjacent student housing. If this <br />parking is provided in a parking deck or ramp, the structure <br />will meet all applicable setbacks and will be constructed of <br />high quality materials compatible with the design of the other <br />buildings in the PUD, and will be adequately landscaped on all <br />sides, especially toward Snelling Avenue. Compliance with <br />these issues shall be determined by the City Development <br />Review Committee. If the Development Review Committee <br />believes that the design does not fit within these guidelines, <br />this portion of the project will be referred to the Planning <br />Commission and City Council for an amendment to the PUD. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />Ownership <br />approvals <br />property. <br />developed <br /> <br />of the Simpson parcel be finalized before any final <br />are given for the PUD that might affect that <br />A plan for interim use of the parcel should be <br />and reviewed by staff. <br /> <br />13. As much vegetation as possible along the creek be left intact. <br /> <br />14. The possibility of installing stop signs on Lincoln Drive at <br />the entrance to the independent living facility be studied. <br /> <br />15. Staff review traffic count methodology. <br /> <br />16. The ponds be maintained by applicant and designed to meet <br />Metropolitan Council recommended standards. Staff should <br />review and recommend a maintenance schedule if appropriate. <br /> <br />17. The applicant be encouraged to increase evergreen materials. <br /> <br />18. There be strong architectural continuity for the entire <br />project. Staff should review all future development to insure <br />that continuity is maintained. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Roberts, Thomas, Harms, <br />Sandstrom, Wietecki <br /> <br />Wall, <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />The Planning Commission meeting recessed at 9:40 p.m. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission meeting reconvened at 9:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Planning File 2496 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.