My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_940209
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1994
>
pm_940209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:14 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/9/1994
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Wednesday, February 9, 1994 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />5. Consent Agenda: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />6. Public Hearings: <br /> <br />(a) Planning File 2634 <br /> <br />Space Center, Inc.'s request for rezoning from B-6 to Planned Unit Development. The <br />applicant wishes to construct a 121,000 square foot office/warehouse building located <br />at 2481 North Cleveland Avenue. Chairman Keith Wietecki opened the public hearing <br />and requested City Planner Michael Falk to provide a background report regarding the <br />request for a Planned Unit Development. Falk reminded the Planning Commission that <br />they had previously approved this project and that the City Council had requested a <br />continued hearing until the Commission considered Planned Unit Development <br />rezoning for this project. The purpose of the Planned Unit rezoning for this project <br />would be to add specific conditions under which the approval would be granted. <br /> <br />Mr. Falk noted that the project has not changed except the applicant has provided an <br />alternate south and east front exterior elevation for the buildings. This elevation would <br />not have a full glass frontage. <br /> <br />Falk recommended approval of the project. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki asked for clarification regarding the concept stage of the PUD in <br />that, if changes were to occur to the exterior elevations, would the project have to <br />return to the Planning Commission for further review? Falk responded that the <br />Commission would have to stipulate that either they were comfortable with elevations <br />from the original concept and elevations from the alternate as currently presented, or <br />request the developer to come back to the Planning Commission with any additional <br />changes beyond the original proposal. He noted that special conditions can be placed <br />on the PUD and that the building materials have not changed by the proportional use <br />of glass and other materials would change if alternate "B" exterior design was used. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.