pm_940914 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Motion: Member Harms moved, seconded by Member Rengle to continue Case 2696 (OneComm/Buell Consulting Request for Height Exemption for Cellular Tower) to the October 12, 1994 regular Planning Commission meeting. Roll Call: Ayes: Wall, Sandstrom, Rengel, Harms, Harms, Wietecki Nays: None Motion: Member Harms moved, seconded by Member Rengle to continue Case 2699 (Good Value Homes Preliminary and Final Plat Request and Amendment to PUD) to the October 12, 1994, regular Planning Commission meeting. Roll Call: Ayes: Wall, Sandstrom, Rengel, Harms, Harms, Wietecki Nays: None Chairman Keith Wietecki noted that resident John Sazma rrom 1065 Grandview expressed concern with Case 2699. No stop sign had been placed at the intersection of the Good Value Homes with Grandview; the ponding areas had not been completed; construction workers were parking on Grandview; and the hours of operation and construction began before 7:00 a.m. which is a violation of the City Code. Chairman Wietecki asked the staff to review these issues with Good Value Homes and Mr. Sazma. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (d) Planning File 2701 Pacific Mutual Door Company's request for a variance to the zoning ordinance to construct an addition on the site at 2644 and 2655 Fairview Avenue North. Chairman Keith Wietecki opened the public hearing on the Pacific Door variance request and requested City Planner Michael Falk to provide a background report. Mr. Falk explained that currently Pacific Door has a 55,000 square foot building on 2.35 acres in an 1-1Light Industrial zone located at the corner ofFairview Avenue and County Road C. Two variances have been requested: one of which is for lot coverage in which Pacific Door would place a building on 44 percent of the lot. (The City Code allows for 30 percent coverage of the lot.) The second variance requested is a variance for front yard setback. The existing building and parking setback allows for vehicles to be parked within 10 feet of the Fairview Avenue property line. (The Code requires a 40 foot setback.) Mr. Falk described the architecture, the overhead doors and the brick exterior with brick highlights along the north wall. He also explained the screening along the northwest corner of the site and the trashmaster configuration in the rear of the building. No site 2