My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_941012
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1994
>
pm_941012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:21 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/12/1994
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />storm ponds and improve the lake and water quality, while protecting the natural ecology <br />and wildlife habitat. In addition, the new regulations will continue to improve the <br />aesthetic environment of the community, and meet the goals and expectations of the new <br />Comprehensive Plan and the citizen's Vista 2000 programs. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsh noted that Roseville has one of the oldest (1974) Shoreland Ordinances in the <br />State of Minnesota. Shoreland protection and preserving the shoreland environment <br />quality were the original purposes of the 1974 ordinance in which the city took a more <br />stringent view of subdivision, on-site septic systems, filling and vegetative cutting along its <br />shorelines ofDNR-classified lakes. At that time, the setbacks were 75' rrom the shoreline <br />for a residence, 100' in width for residential lots, and 12,500 square feet for lot sizes for <br />residential uses. The original regulation only affected the 5-state classified lakes in the <br />city. However, the city extended the regulations to any water body of 5 acres or more in <br />size. In 1974, the regulations affected 720 acres of land and approximately 265 parcels of <br />land. <br /> <br />The proposed ordinance changes included expanding environmental regulations to all city <br />classified lakes, wetlands, and storm ponds, as well as the 5 DNR-classified lakes in the <br />community. The new regulations would affect over 1700 acres oflake and water, and <br />over 1600 parcels, but less than 1 % of the parcels are yet to be developed. Under the <br />revisions to the Ordinance, 75' of setback would be required rrom the shoreline and 100' <br />of residential lot width would be required. In addition, a residential lot would have 12,500 <br />square feet oflot size, and houses would be setback 30' from bluff lines. Lots which are <br />within 100' of wetland ponds or storm ponds would have a 50' setback for all structures. <br />Seventy-five (75) percent of each of the lots must be above the high water mark. Also, <br />vegetation and trees between the structure and the shore (regardless of whether it's a pond <br />or a DNR-classified lake) must be protected. Accessory structures between the structure <br />and the shoreline are permitted, but with special precautions for homes built after 1974, <br />must meet the same setback as the structure. Grading and filling, as well as land <br />alteration, will require permits for the movement of more than 10 cubic yards of material. <br />No grading or disruption may occur on the bluffs. Storm water management is required. <br />Impervious surfaces will not exceed 25% of any lot coverage. Variances, rezoning, <br />conditional use permits, and subdivisions, must be reviewed by the Minnesota Department <br />of Natural Resources after the City Council has made a decision. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch provided a comparison chart in which he illustrated the differences between <br />the current Shoreland Code and the proposed revisions, including shoreland, wetland, and <br />storm pond areas. <br /> <br />A general discussion insued regarding the effect of the Shoreland Ordinance. Chairperson <br />Thomas asked if there was comment from the public. There was none. <br /> <br />Chairperson Thomas closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.