pm_950614 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Chairman Keith Wietecki opened the public hearing and requested a background report from Michael Falk. City Planner Michael Falk provided a review of the design guidelines requiring that, when an existing parking lot is overlaid or rebuilt by more than 25 percent, new paving and concrete curb and gutter are required. The church is requesting a variance from the east, south and north sides of the parking lot to eliminate the need to construct a concrete curb at this time. The church foresees a time, in the near future, when the development will occur along those three sides of the parking lot and placing concrete curb there, at this time, would have been wasted material. The staff recommended approval of the variance, because of the future possibilities of development on or near that parking lot site. There were no comments from the public. Chairman Keith Wietecki closed the hearing. MOTION: Member Wietecki moved, seconded by Member Rengel, to recommend approval of the variance from City Code Section 10-10.06 to allow "no curb" to be placed adjacent to the Corpus Christi Church parking lot along the north, south, east edges for a period of 5 years from approval (July 2000) after which the church will complete the curbline. ROLL CALL: Ayes: Wietecki, Harms, Wall, Rengel, Rhody, Thein. Nays: None 6. (Q Amendments to the Roseville Sien Ordinance of Section 14.150 and 14.155 regarding lighter than air balloons, Section 14.155 regarding flags, Section 203.080 and 203.170 regarding outside storage. Chairman Keith Wietecki opened the public hearing and requested the staff report. Community Development Director, Dennis Welsch, provided background information on the proposed Sign Code Amendment requested by the City Council. The provisions of the Amendment would clarify the definitions regarding signage; change the organization of the sign code to read more clearly; create one section within the code which itemizes prohibited signs; to place all temporary signs in one section; and to limit temporary signs to 12 days, per year instead of 60 days; prohibit banners; clarify the use of "holiday" signs. In addition, the proposed Sign Code would limit flags on anyone property ownership to 4 flags per ownership. The Planning Commission asked for further clarification to Section 1009.03A9 which reads "Displays or features on any landscaped area except light poles." In this Section, the Planning Commission recommended "excepting" the use of "live vegetation". In Section 1009.03 of the Amendment, Paragraph M, Page 6, the Planning Commission recommended adding the following language "WINDOW SIGNS: signs affixed to, or painted on, windows or placed within 36 inches. . . ." A general discussion ensued regarding the potential objections to these code amendments from car dealers. 8