My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_950809
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1995
>
pm_950809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:33 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/9/1995
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />August 9, 1995 <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki provided a general background regarding the use of a conditional use <br />permit within a shopping center versus that of a PUD. He explained that a PUD would <br />give more authority and provide more restrictions than a conditional use permit in any <br />business district. Member Harms stated that no other shopping center would be <br />acceptable for a bingo hall in her mind, but this proposal would be acceptable within the <br />Hamline Shopping Center. <br /> <br />Member Rhody asked where bingo halls are currently allowed in a B 1 zone. City Planner <br />Falk pointed out the locations on the zoning map for Bl and B2 districts. Member <br />Sandstrom commented that this may be a rare situation where the city should promote <br />"spot rezoning." He asked what type of criteria should apply when a rezoning or <br />conditional use permit for a bingo hall is applied for. Member Rhody stated that he was <br />concerned about the use of a PUD and that more time may be needed to consider this <br />alternative. Chairman Wietecki stated that a PUD should be guided by the underlying <br />zoning uses. Member Rhody stated that the basis to say "no" to bingo halls is in the city <br />license for such activities. <br /> <br />Mary Zimery, representing the Roseville Skating Club, stated that a PUD would tie the <br />hands of the bingo operators and would restrict their area. Each charity must go through <br />the licensing process. More bingo halls in Roseville would put the original bingo hall out <br />of business. The original ordinance was geared to small bingo parlors, and is more like a <br />theater or entertainment center. <br /> <br />John Owens, 1345 Skillman, representing the Knights of Columbus, stated that the city <br />code calls for one gambling hall in Roseville. A gambling hall with two licenses or more <br />must be licensed by the city and the state. The current licensees run a clean operation. A <br />second gambling hall simply will not be supported in Roseville. <br /> <br />Jim Smith, Kraus Anderson, stated that Kraus Anderson would not open the bingo hall if <br />required to apply for a PUD because it would put more restrictions on the Hamline <br />Center. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki stated that the PUD could be restricted to that area of the Center <br />where the bingo hall is placed. Paul Bauer, Roseville Youth Hockey, stated the <br />ordinance would require a conditional use permit and a license which is adequate for <br />control. Tim Lynch stated he was opposed to the delay of the ordinance. <br /> <br />There was no further public comment. Chairman Wietecki closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Member Sandstrom asked if the site could be rezoned as B 1 within the existing shopping <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.