My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_980527
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1998
>
pm_980527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:14 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/27/1998
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of the 6.2 site and approve a mixed use concept Planned Unit Development <br />with business uses on the east half of the 6.2 acre site along Snelling <br />Avenue and high density residential uses on the west half of the 6.2 acre <br />site now zoned B-1 (Limited Business).The approximate legal description <br />of this property is part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of <br />the Northeast Quarter, Section 9, Township 29 - Range 23, commonly <br />known as the property located west of Snelling Avenue, south of <br />Rosebrook Park, east of the James Addition neighborhood, and north of <br />Roseville Crossroads. <br />Chair Harms opened the hearing and requested Dennis Welsch to present a <br />summary of staff report dated April 8, 1998. The request before the Planning <br />Commission is to take one of two actions regarding the southeastern 6.2 acres <br />of the James Addition neighborhood. The James Addition Task Force met for six <br />months and made a recommendation to the City Council regarding this issue. <br />The City Council asked the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing on the <br />two scenarios. The first scenario would change the comprehensive plan <br />designation to High Density Residential and the zoning to a residential Planned <br />Unit Development. The second scenario would change the comprehensive plan <br />designation for the west half of the site to High Density Residential and the <br />zoning of the entire 6.2 acres to a mixed use PUD. Mr. Welsch presented <br />background information on the area including: existing land uses, ownership, <br />present comprehensive plan designations, zoning. Options considered by the <br />Task Force, the recommendation of the Task Force and an alternative proposal <br />by National Tire and Battery were also reviewed. <br />Staff is recommending approval of the concept presented by the James Addition <br />Task Force (Scenario 1). <br />Member Cunningham asked for a comparison of the traffic impact of the two <br />scenarios.(40 trips/1000 sq. ft. vs 1 to 2 per unit per day). <br />MemberWilke asked what the number of vehicle trips are now compared to what <br />could be with the two scenarios (not high, but surge during bingo activities at <br />Knights of Columbus). <br />Member Olson asked why National Tire and Battery needs a Conditional Use <br />Permit (a conditional use permit is required for auto service uses within the B-2 <br />Zoning District). <br />MemberMulder asked what is the current tax base? ($84,000 in taxes for 1997 <br />for entire 6.2 acres based on $1.6 million in assessed market value. The <br />projected value with scenario 1 (185 units) would be greater than $14 million). <br />Member Cunningham asked for details concerning the projections of a traffic <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.