My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_990113
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1999
>
pm_990113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:31 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/13/1999
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Gd. Planning File 3089. The City of Roseville is requesting vacation of a 35-foot water main easement located across Lot <br />1, Block 2, Gateway Business Park. Replacement easements have been provided and this easement is no longer <br />necessary. <br /> <br />Chair Harms opened the hearing and requested Dennis Welsch summarize the staff report. <br /> <br />There being no comments, Chair Harms closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Wilke moved, seconded by Member Rhody, to recommend approval of the request for vacation of a 35' <br />water main easement across Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway Business Park, and acceptance of a replacement water main <br />easement, based on staff findings in the January 13, 1999 report. <br /> <br />On a roll call vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: Mulder, Rhody, Harms, Klausing, Olson, Wilke, Cunningham <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried 7-0. <br /> <br />7. Presentations And Other Actions <br /> <br />7a. Planning File 307G. Recommendations to City Council on Lexington and B Land Uses. <br /> <br />Member Mulder recommended a three-step approach: <br />1. Proceed with six acre park; <br />2. Plaza in two acres <br />3. Reserve in the two acres, an area for future activities or community rooms in the future, integrating this use with the <br />park as it is actually used. <br /> <br />Member Mulder suggested that use of the three-step process would narrow the discussion and provide opportunity for the <br />future. <br /> <br />Chair Harms asked that parking be designated carefully. Member Mulder suggested two smaller, separate lots. <br /> <br />Member Olson asked if a vote should be taken regarding active versus passive uses. <br /> <br />Member Klausing stated that this (Mulder recommendation) may not totally meet the Council wishes, but it is direction. <br /> <br />Member Wilke said he supports Mulder recommendation especially in light of City Center Plan that will absorb many uses. <br />It may be premature to go to retail or housing on the site. <br /> <br />Member Klausing expressed interest in moving the six-acre park forward; the park should drive the uses on the other two <br />acres. <br /> <br />Chair Harms noted that when the six acres are developed, neighborhood planning might help identify synergistic uses for <br />the two-acre site. <br /> <br />This was the consensus of the Commission. <br /> <br />8. Information, Reports And Other Business (Verbal Reports) <br /> <br />Chair Harms informed the Planning Commission that Council liaisons will be changing; the liaison will sit at the back of the <br />meeting and will answer questions as requested. <br /> <br />9. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 10:17 p.m. <br /> <br />Back to Planning Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.